From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1609C2BA83 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4A1218AC for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729901AbgBMMLg (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:11:36 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51758 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727059AbgBMMLf (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:11:35 -0500 Received: from [5.158.153.52] (helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1j2DLA-0000Ho-KK; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:11:32 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52D7D1013A6; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:11:32 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Arul Jeniston Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arul_mc@dell.com, Matt Domsch Subject: Re: [PATCH] FS: timerfd: Fix unexpected return value of timerfd_read function. In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:11:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhdm1ybv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arul, Arul Jeniston writes: > Did you get a chance to update the timerfd man page? Obviously not. > Our customers are expecting these changes to happen asap. You surely understand that both the kernel and the manpages are available to you (Dell) free of charge. If Dell provides these things under a commercial contract to customers, then Dells customers surely can have expectations from Dell. But that's none of my and any other contributors business. If you need these changes ASAP, then either make them yourself or contract someone who can do it for you. Just making demands on a public mailing list in order to sort your business problems is neither appropriate nor acceptable. You're neither my boss nor do I have any contractual obligations with Dell. You surely achieved something. The priority of this has moved right to the bottom of my todo list. It's going to be worked on when I run out of other things to fix or if I really get bored. Both won't happen anytime soon. Thanks, Thomas