From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32D8C43219 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BB4214C6 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726594AbfDZS7C (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:59:02 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:5933 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726358AbfDZS7C (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:59:02 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2019 11:59:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,398,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="168268245" Received: from dlevy1-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.47.21]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2019 11:58:59 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Docs: An initial automarkup extension for sphinx In-Reply-To: <20190426105209.1e414eae@lwn.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20190425200125.12302-1-corbet@lwn.net> <20190425200125.12302-2-corbet@lwn.net> <87tvelrv8d.fsf@intel.com> <20190426105209.1e414eae@lwn.net> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:58:58 +0300 Message-ID: <87zhoch9u5.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > I am not at all opposed to a more proper solution that might, in the > long term, produce more deterministic results. I can even try to work in > that direction. But this is something that can be done now that, IMO, > doesn't in any way close off a better implementation in the future. If we > agree that we should automatically generate references for occurrences of > "function()", we can change how that is actually done later. > > I'll look into this further, but my inclination is to go forward with what > I have now. It's simple and easy to understand, and doesn't seem to screw > up anywhere in the current body of kernel docs as far as I can tell. Fair enough. It's most important that this doesn't block us from switching to a different implementation later once someone figures it out. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center