Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and hypercall improvements

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com>,
	Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and hypercall improvements
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:53:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziafwzzj.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831122254.y7v6jenwhxmf2uim@gmail.com> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:22:55 +0200")

Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:

> * Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> > Changes since v9:
>> > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3.
>> > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no
>> >   functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree
>> >   (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right).
>> > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH]
>> > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in
>> >   hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko]
>> > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2
>> >   reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>)
>> > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9.
>> 
>> Ingo,
>> 
>> this series ended up being 'almost merged' - you merged all but the last
>> two patches to 'x86/platform' branch when Peter reported an issue with
>> pagetable walkers. Now as we have 'x86/mm: Enable RCU based page table
>> freeing (CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y)' merged to 'x86/mm' this is
>> resolved and we can hopefully proceed with this series. Could you please
>> let me know if I need to resend these last two patches or if you can
>> take them from v10?
>
> Ok, I have merged tip:x86/mm into tip:x86/platform to pick up the dependency and 
> have applied patches #9 and #10.

Hope you meant '#8 and #9' as v10 had only 9 patches :-)

> Will push it all out after testing.
>

Thanks!

-- 
  Vitaly