From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272511AbTGaPLM (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:11:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272509AbTGaPJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:09:44 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:52997 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272508AbTGaPIW (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:08:22 -0400 To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Cc: Ren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp() References: <20030727172150.15f8df7f.l.s.r@web.de> <200307311224.h6VCOMj19676@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <87r846yfag.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <200307311357.h6VDvEj20416@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:07:58 +0900 In-Reply-To: <200307311357.h6VDvEj20416@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Message-ID: <87zniuwx81.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Denis Vlasenko writes: > Yes, but some future version would. > > Since there is no substantial wins in hunting down > such statics, and there is some risk of code bloat when > big inlined statics get called from more that one callsite, > and it will be automatically handled by smarter compiler someday, > I think it makes perfect sense to avoid doing this. Could you tell me, if compiler does it in future? I'll gladly kill that inline. -- OGAWA Hirofumi