On 20.03.23 23:42, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:47:30PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Since this code covers TDX guest too, I think eventually it makes sense for TDX
>>> guest to use this function too (to avoid #VE IIUC).  If want to do that, then I
>>> think TDX guest should have the same mutual understanding with *ALL* hypervisor,
>>> as I am not sure what's the point of making the TDX guest's MTRR behaviour
>>> depending on specific hypervisor.
>>
>> This series tries to fix the current fallout.
> 
> We can relax the check so that it runs on TDX too. Along with a comment
> above it why it needs to run on TDX.
> 

Okay, fine with me.


Juergen