linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Donnelly <John.P.donnelly@oracle.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, dyoung@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, horms@verge.net.au,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, pkushwaha@marvell.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:20:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <897ea1b9-a68c-8544-6532-a21be135ce01@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526014242.GF20045@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>


On 5/25/20 8:42 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 05/21/20 at 05:38pm, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> This patch series enable reserving crashkernel above 4G in arm64.
>>
>> There are following issues in arm64 kdump:
>> 1. We use crashkernel=X to reserve crashkernel below 4G, which will fail
>> when there is no enough low memory.
>> 2. Currently, crashkernel=Y@X can be used to reserve crashkernel above 4G,
>> in this case, if swiotlb or DMA buffers are required, crash dump kernel
>> will boot failure because there is no low memory available for allocation.
>>
>> To solve these issues, introduce crashkernel=X,low to reserve specified
>> size low memory.
>> Crashkernel=X tries to reserve memory for the crash dump kernel under
>> 4G. If crashkernel=Y,low is specified simultaneously, reserve spcified
>> size low memory for crash kdump kernel devices firstly and then reserve
>> memory above 4G.
>>
>> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, that is, crashkernel=X,low
>> is specified simultaneously, kernel should reserve specified size low memory
>> for crash dump kernel devices. So there may be two crash kernel regions, one
>> is below 4G, the other is above 4G.
>> In order to distinct from the high region and make no effect to the use of
>> kexec-tools, rename the low region as "Crash kernel (low)", and add DT property
>> "linux,low-memory-range" to crash dump kernel's dtb to pass the low region.
>>
>> Besides, we need to modify kexec-tools:
>> arm64: kdump: add another DT property to crash dump kernel's dtb(see [1])
>>
>> The previous changes and discussions can be retrieved from:
>>
>> Changes since [v7]
>> - Move x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M
>> Suggested by Dave and do some test, move x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M.
> OK, moving x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M is suggested by Dave. Because
> CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN can be selected from 2M to 16M. So 2M seems good.
> But, anyway, we should tell the reason why it need be changed in commit
> log.
>
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig:
> config PHYSICAL_ALIGN
>          hex "Alignment value to which kernel should be aligned"
>          default "0x200000"
>          range 0x2000 0x1000000 if X86_32
>          range 0x200000 0x1000000 if X86_64
>
>> - Update Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
>> Add corresponding documentation to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt suggested by Arnd.
>> - Add Tested-by from Jhon and pk
>>
>> Changes since [v6]
>> - Fix build errors reported by kbuild test robot.
>>
>> Changes since [v5]
>> - Move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kernel/crash_core.c.
>> - Delete crashkernel=X,high.
> And the crashkernel=X,high being deleted need be told too. Otherwise
> people reading the commit have to check why themselves. I didn't follow
> the old version, can't see why ,high can't be specified explicitly.
>
>> - Modify crashkernel=X,low.
>> If crashkernel=X,low is specified simultaneously, reserve spcified size low
>> memory for crash kdump kernel devices firstly and then reserve memory above 4G.
>> In addition, rename crashk_low_res as "Crash kernel (low)" for arm64, and then
>> pass to crash dump kernel by DT property "linux,low-memory-range".
>> - Update Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
>>
>> Changes since [v4]
>> - Reimplement memblock_cap_memory_ranges for multiple ranges by Mike.
>>
>> Changes since [v3]
>> - Add memblock_cap_memory_ranges back for multiple ranges.
>> - Fix some compiling warnings.
>>
>> Changes since [v2]
>> - Split patch "arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G" as
>> two. Put "move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c" in a separate
>> patch.
>>
>> Changes since [v1]:
>> - Move common reserve_crashkernel_low() code into kernel/kexec_core.c.
>> - Remove memblock_cap_memory_ranges() i added in v1 and implement that
>> in fdt_enforce_memory_region().
>> There are at most two crash kernel regions, for two crash kernel regions
>> case, we cap the memory range [min(regs[*].start), max(regs[*].end)]
>> and then remove the memory range in the middle.
>>
>> [1]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2020-May/025128.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJwQs3C4x$
>> [v1]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/2/1174__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJ6e-mIEp$
>> [v2]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/86__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJyUVjUta$
>> [v3]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/306__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJ3CXBRdT$
>> [v4]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/15/273__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJ7SxW1Vj$
>> [v5]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/6/1360__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJ2wyJ9tj$
>> [v6]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/30/142__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJzvGhWBh$
>> [v7]: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/23/411__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJ6pAg6tX$
>>
>> Chen Zhou (5):
>>    x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into crash_core.c
>>    arm64: kdump: reserve crashkenel above 4G for crash dump kernel
>>    arm64: kdump: add memory for devices by DT property, low-memory-range
>>    kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64
>>    dt-bindings: chosen: Document linux,low-memory-range for arm64 kdump
>>
>>   Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst     | 13 ++-
>>   .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 12 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt  | 25 ++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c                     |  8 +-
>>   arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          | 61 ++++++++++++-
>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c                       | 66 ++------------
>>   include/linux/crash_core.h                    |  3 +
>>   include/linux/kexec.h                         |  2 -
>>   kernel/crash_core.c                           | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   kernel/kexec_core.c                           | 17 ----
>>   10 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kexec mailing list
>> kexec@lists.infradead.org
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NHQIQVbVz5bR1SSP7U7SwT3uHb6OnycPGa6nM0oLTaQdZT4pjRsjrMjn5GqOJwwX8HSl$
>>



Hi,



This proposal to improve vmcore creation on Arm  has been going on for 
almost a year now.

Who is the  final maintainer that needs to approve and except these ?

What are the lingering issues that are remaining so we get these 
accepted into a upstream commit ?


Thank you.

John.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-21  9:38 [PATCH v8 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Chen Zhou
2020-05-21  9:38 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into crash_core.c Chen Zhou
2020-05-26  0:56   ` Baoquan He
2020-05-21  9:38 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] arm64: kdump: reserve crashkenel above 4G for crash dump kernel Chen Zhou
2020-05-26  0:59   ` Baoquan He
2020-05-21  9:38 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] arm64: kdump: add memory for devices by DT property, low-memory-range Chen Zhou
2020-05-21  9:38 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64 Chen Zhou
2020-05-21  9:38 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] dt-bindings: chosen: Document linux,low-memory-range for arm64 kdump Chen Zhou
2020-05-21 13:29   ` Rob Herring
2020-05-22  3:24     ` chenzhou
2020-05-26 21:18       ` Rob Herring
2020-05-29 16:11         ` James Morse
2020-06-20  3:54           ` chenzhou
2020-05-26  1:42 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on " Baoquan He
2020-05-26  2:28   ` chenzhou
2020-05-28 22:20   ` John Donnelly [this message]
2020-05-29  8:05     ` Will Deacon
2020-06-01 12:02 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2020-06-01 19:30   ` John Donnelly
2020-06-01 21:02     ` Bhupesh Sharma
2020-06-01 21:59       ` John Donnelly
2020-06-02  5:38         ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2020-06-02 14:41           ` John Donnelly
2020-06-03 11:47             ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2020-06-03 13:20               ` chenzhou
2020-06-03 15:30                 ` John Donnelly
2020-06-03 19:47                   ` Bhupesh Sharma
2020-06-04  7:14                     ` Will Deacon
2020-06-04 17:01                     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-06-05  2:26                       ` John Donnelly
2020-06-05  8:21                         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-06-19  2:32                       ` John Donnelly
2020-06-19  8:21                         ` chenzhou
2020-06-20  0:01                           ` John Donnelly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=897ea1b9-a68c-8544-6532-a21be135ce01@oracle.com \
    --to=john.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenzhou10@huawei.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pkushwaha@marvell.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).