linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
	Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:59:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8989a07b-3a5b-0c81-983f-b35403d19579@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YjN2qsXkmlEUTg4u@arm.com>

On 17.03.22 18:58, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:04:18AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.03.22 19:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:18:34PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> @@ -909,12 +925,13 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>  /*
>>>>   * Encode and decode a swap entry:
>>>>   *	bits 0-1:	present (must be zero)
>>>> - *	bits 2-7:	swap type
>>>> + *	bits 2:		remember PG_anon_exclusive
>>>> + *	bits 3-7:	swap type
>>>>   *	bits 8-57:	swap offset
>>>>   *	bit  58:	PTE_PROT_NONE (must be zero)
>>>
>>> I don't remember exactly why we reserved bits 0 and 1 when, from the
>>> hardware perspective, it's sufficient for bit 0 to be 0 and the whole
>>> pte becomes invalid. We use bit 1 as the 'table' bit (when 0 at pmd
>>> level, it's a huge page) but we shouldn't check for this on a swap
>>> entry.
>>
>> You mean
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h:#define PTE_TABLE_BIT            (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 1)
>>
>> right?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> I wonder why it even exists, for arm64 I only spot:
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:#define pte_mkhuge(pte)                (__pte(pte_val(pte) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT))
>>
>> I don't really see code that sets PTE_TABLE_BIT.
>>
>> Similarly, I don't see code that sets PMD_TABLE_BIT/PUD_TABLE_BIT/P4D_TABLE_BIT.
>> Most probably setting code is not using the defines,  that's why I'm not finding it.
> 
> It gets set as part of P*D_TYPE_TABLE via p*d_populate(). We use the
> P*D_TABLE_BIT mostly for checking whether it's a huge page or not (the
> arm64 hugetlbpage.c code).
> 

Makes sense, after digging into the arm arm, I agree that it should
be safe to reuse bit 1. I'll use this (yet untested) patch in v2:


From a48d08339574b7c42e0b032f0fc334872591744c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:46:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE

Let's use bit 1, which should be irrelevant if the PTE is marked invalid
eiher way --  we really only care about bit 0.

Note that one alternative would be using one of the type bits: core-mm only
supports 5 bits, so there is no need to reserve space for 6.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h      | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
index b1e1b74d993c..fd6ddf14c190 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
  * Software defined PTE bits definition.
  */
 #define PTE_WRITE		(PTE_DBM)		 /* same as DBM (51) */
+#define PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE	(PTE_TABLE_BIT)		 /* only for swp ptes */
 #define PTE_DIRTY		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 55)
 #define PTE_SPECIAL		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 56)
 #define PTE_DEVMAP		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 57)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 94e147e5456c..c78994073cd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -402,6 +402,22 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_pmd_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot)
 	return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PMD_TABLE_BIT) | PMD_TYPE_SECT);
 }
 
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkexclusive(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
+}
+
+static inline int pte_swp_exclusive(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return pte_val(pte) & PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE;
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
 /*
  * See the comment in include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -908,7 +924,8 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 /*
  * Encode and decode a swap entry:
- *	bits 0-1:	present (must be zero)
+ *	bits 0:		present (must be zero)
+ *	bits 1:		remember PG_anon_exclusive
  *	bits 2-7:	swap type
  *	bits 8-57:	swap offset
  *	bit  58:	PTE_PROT_NONE (must be zero)
-- 
2.35.1


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-15 14:18 [PATCH v1 0/7] mm: COW fixes part 3: reliable GUP R/W FOLL_GET of anonymous pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] mm/swap: remember PG_anon_exclusive via a swp pte bit David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: add tests for __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] x86/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 18:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-17 10:04     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-17 17:58       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-18  9:59         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-03-18 11:33           ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-18 14:14             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-21 14:38     ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:39       ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 15:07       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-21 17:44         ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 18:27           ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-22  9:46             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] s390/pgtable: " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:21   ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-15 16:37     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:12         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:14           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 10:56           ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 11:06             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 13:01             ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-16 13:27               ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 14:00                 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] powerpc/pgtable: remove _PAGE_BIT_SWAP_TYPE for book3s David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] powerpc/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 23:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] mm: COW fixes part 3: reliable GUP R/W FOLL_GET of anonymous pages Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-19 11:17   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8989a07b-3a5b-0c81-983f-b35403d19579@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=oded.gabbay@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pedrodemargomes@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).