linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, seanjc@google.com,
	jarkko@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is destroyed
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:39:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89b29a2b-0050-cef4-8bf7-0b3bc2f5c170@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615101639.291929-1-kai.huang@intel.com>

On 6/15/21 3:16 AM, Kai Huang wrote:
> xa_destroy() needs to be called to destroy virtual EPC's page arra
> before calling kfree() to free the virtual EPC.  Currently it is not
> calaled.  Add the missing xa_destroy() to fix.

Looks good Kai, thanks for fixing this.

Could you please take a good look through the sgx_release() and the vpec
equivalent and see if anything else stands out as possibly being missed?
 Also, is this the kind of thing that a simple open/add/close selftest
might have found?

Maybe we should beef up the selftests a bit.

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 10:16 [PATCH] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is destroyed Kai Huang
2021-06-15 13:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-16  0:30   ` Kai Huang
2021-06-17 14:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-18  0:04       ` Kai Huang
2021-06-18  5:15         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-15 15:39 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-06-16  0:28   ` Kai Huang
2021-06-15 16:16 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kai Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89b29a2b-0050-cef4-8bf7-0b3bc2f5c170@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).