From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751787AbdF3O4h (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:56:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:37028 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751545AbdF3O4e (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:56:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Dick Kennedy , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <20170630080250.mjbosf64qlytrsii@mwanda> From: James Smart Message-ID: <89beb27c-0844-1bba-dcf3-4f64c167782c@broadcom.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:56:29 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170630080250.mjbosf64qlytrsii@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/30/2017 1:02 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We're calling spin_lock_irq() multiple times, the problem is that on the > first spin_unlock_irq() then we will re-enable IRQs and we don't want > that. > > Fixes: 966bb5b71196 ("scsi: lpfc: Break up IO ctx list into a separate get and put list") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > looks good. Signed-off-By: James Smart