From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:38:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:38:40 -0400 Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18]:3221 "EHLO mailout04.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:38:28 -0400 Date: 04 Oct 2001 21:50:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8ADlROk1w-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <20011004034600.B29438@codepoet.org> Subject: Re: Security question: "Text file busy" overwriting executables but no X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh7 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: <20011004113019.L22640@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <20011004113019.L22640@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <20011004034600.B29438@codepoet.org> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org andersen@codepoet.org (Erik Andersen) wrote on 04.10.01 in <20011004034600.B29438@codepoet.org>: > On Thu Oct 04, 2001 at 11:30:19AM +0300, Ville Herva wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:15:01AM -0600, you [Eric W. Biederman] claimed: > > > > > > > > > > Where size is an issue, diet libc might be an alternative: > > > > http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ > > > > (287kB statically linked zsh is not too shabby, I reckon.) > > uClibc is also a nice alternative. Works just great and uses glibc > header files. I only fully support shared libs on x86 and arm > at the moment. > > http://cvs.uclinux.org/uClibc.html > > (I need to update the webpage sometime) > > > That and things like busybox: > > > > http://busybox.lineo.com/ > > Why thanks. I've sure worked hard to make it be nice and small... And some people *still* start threads titled "Busybox still too bloated". (Screaming their heads off for a reduction of around 50 KB, IIRC.) MfG Kai