From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932308AbWGXWnI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:43:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932310AbWGXWnH (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:43:07 -0400 Received: from imo-m19.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.11]:18325 "EHLO imo-m19.mx.aol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932309AbWGXWnG (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:43:06 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:43:00 -0400 From: daveflinux@aim.com Message-Id: <8C87D89A6C9AC58-1FD4-1F71@mblk-d16.sysops.aol.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AIM WebMail 18735 Subject: What is the difference between sk_wmem_queued & sk_wmem_alloc ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-AOL-IP: 205.188.149.8 X-Spam-Flag: NO Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In the sock structure (include/net/sock.h), can anybody tell me the difference between sk_wmem_queued (persistent transmit queue size) & sk_wmem_alloc (transmit queue bytes commited). Both appear to serve the same function. thanks Dave ________________________________________________________________________ Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.