From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:02:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa33de4-db18-759b-d2cb-0e25d5ab9d88@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612092305060.3612@nanos>
On 12/09/2016 05:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Boris, can you please verify if that makes the
> topology_update_package_map() call which you placed into the Xen cpu
> starting code obsolete ?
Will do. I did test your patch but without removing
topology_update_package_map() call. It complained about package IDs
being wrong, but that's expected until I fix Xen part.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-09 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-08 9:04 [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-08 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-08 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-08 12:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-08 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-08 13:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-09 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-09 23:02 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-12-09 23:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-10 3:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-10 19:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-10 3:27 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-10 19:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-10 19:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-11 3:23 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-12 10:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-12 19:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-13 11:16 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-06 13:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Max Vozeler
2017-06-07 1:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-07 12:19 ` Max Vozeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aa33de4-db18-759b-d2cb-0e25d5ab9d88@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ciwillia@brocade.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.v.b@runbox.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).