From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/10] arm64/mm: Detect and enable FEAT_LPA2
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8adefac5-c677-1fca-20dd-bba8543f8d59@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18c42dd0-b6db-d118-dad0-cac0bf6ab2ce@arm.com>
On 7/14/21 1:51 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 14/07/2021 03:21, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Detect FEAT_LPA2 implementation early enough during boot when requested via
>> CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52_LPA2 and remember in a variable arm64_lpa2_enabled.
>> This variable could then be used to turn on TCR_EL1.TCR_DS effecting the 52
>> bits PA range or fall back to default 48 bits PA range if FEAT_LPA2 feature
>> was requested but found not to be implemented.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 3 +++
>> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 9 +++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> index 824a365..d0ca002 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@
>> #include <asm/bug.h>
>> extern u64 vabits_actual;
>> +extern u64 arm64_lpa2_enabled;
>> extern s64 memstart_addr;
>> /* PHYS_OFFSET - the physical address of the start of memory. */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> index 6444147..9cf79ea 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> @@ -94,6 +94,21 @@ SYM_CODE_START(primary_entry)
>> adrp x23, __PHYS_OFFSET
>> and x23, x23, MIN_KIMG_ALIGN - 1 // KASLR offset, defaults to 0
>> bl set_cpu_boot_mode_flag
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52_LPA2
>> + mrs x10, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1
>> + ubfx x10, x10, #ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN_SHIFT, 4
>> + cmp x10, #ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN_LPA2
>> + b.ne 1f
>
> For the sake of forward compatibility, this should be "b.lt"
Right, I guess we could assume that the feature will be present from the
current ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN_LPA2 values onward in the future. But should
not this also be capped at ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN_SUPPORTED_MAX as the upper
limit is different for 4K and 16K page sizes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-16 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 2:21 [RFC 00/10] arm64/mm: Enable FEAT_LPA2 (52 bits PA support on 4K|16K pages) Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 01/10] mm/mmap: Dynamically initialize protection_map[] Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 02/10] arm64/mm: Consolidate TCR_EL1 fields Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 03/10] arm64/mm: Add FEAT_LPA2 specific TCR_EL1.DS field Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 04/10] arm64/mm: Add FEAT_LPA2 specific ID_AA64MMFR0.TGRAN[2] Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 05/10] arm64/mm: Add CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52_[LPA|LPA2] Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 06/10] arm64/mm: Add FEAT_LPA2 specific encoding Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 15:38 ` Steven Price
2021-07-16 7:20 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-16 10:02 ` Steven Price
2021-07-16 14:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 07/10] arm64/mm: Detect and enable FEAT_LPA2 Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 8:21 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-07-16 7:06 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-07-16 8:08 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-07-19 4:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 08/10] arm64/mm: Add FEAT_LPA2 specific PTE_SHARED and PMD_SECT_S Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 09/10] arm64/mm: Add FEAT_LPA2 specific fallback (48 bits PA) when not implemented Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-14 2:21 ` [RFC 10/10] arm64/mm: Enable CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52 on CONFIG_ARM64_[4K|16K]_PAGES Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8adefac5-c677-1fca-20dd-bba8543f8d59@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).