From: Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
"clementine.maurice@iaik.tugraz.at"
<clementine.maurice@iaik.tugraz.at>,
"moritz.lipp@iaik.tugraz.at" <moritz.lipp@iaik.tugraz.at>,
Michael Schwarz <michael.schwarz@iaik.tugraz.at>,
Richard Fellner <richard.fellner@student.tugraz.at>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"anders.fogh@gdata-adan.de" <anders.fogh@gdata-adan.de>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC, PATCH] x86_64: KAISER - do not map kernel in user mode
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 00:18:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aecf7d4-9767-5367-1bc0-75fbd4b17e46@iaik.tugraz.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6013bf3f-c3bd-3836-e5e2-ea89cc2e556a@nod.at>
On 2017-05-08 00:02, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ahh, *very* recent is the keyword then. ;)
> I was a bit confused since in your paper the overhead is less than 1%.
Yes, only for very recent platforms (Skylake). While working on the
paper we were surprised that we found overheads that small.
> What platforms did you test?
We tested it on multiple platforms for stability, but we only ran longer
performance tests on different Skylake i7-6700K systems we mentioned in
the paper.
> i.e. how does it perform on recent AMD systems?
Unfortunately, we don't have any AMD systems at hand. I'm also not sure
how AMD is affected by the issue in the first place. Although unlikely,
there is the possibility that the problem of KASLR information leakage
through microarchitectural side channels might be Intel-specific.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-07 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-04 10:02 [RFC, PATCH] x86_64: KAISER - do not map kernel in user mode Daniel Gruss
2017-05-04 12:26 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-04 15:28 ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Garnier
2017-05-05 8:23 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-05 15:47 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-05-06 4:02 ` David Gens
2017-05-06 8:38 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-08 10:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-05-08 10:51 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-08 13:22 ` Mark Rutland
2017-05-08 13:43 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-08 13:53 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-08 14:09 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-05-08 14:19 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-08 13:23 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-04 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-05 7:40 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-07 20:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Richard Weinberger
2017-05-07 21:45 ` Daniel Gruss
2017-05-07 22:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-07 22:18 ` Daniel Gruss [this message]
2017-05-09 14:44 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC, PATCH] x86_64: KAISER - do not mapkernel " Fogh, Anders
2017-05-09 14:57 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-09 15:30 ` Rik van Riel
2017-10-31 23:28 ` Dave Hansen
2017-05-05 15:49 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC, PATCH] x86_64: KAISER - do not map kernel " Jann Horn
2017-05-05 15:53 ` Jann Horn
2017-05-06 8:28 ` Daniel Gruss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aecf7d4-9767-5367-1bc0-75fbd4b17e46@iaik.tugraz.at \
--to=daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=anders.fogh@gdata-adan.de \
--cc=clementine.maurice@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.schwarz@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=moritz.lipp@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=richard.fellner@student.tugraz.at \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).