From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [lkp] [xfs] a08ee40a79: kmsg.XFS(vdd):unknown_mount_option[nosuchopt]
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:46:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b490c2a-505d-bba2-c4a9-b85732505dc5@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160516014233.GA18460@yexl-desktop>
On 5/15/16 8:42 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit a08ee40a79653d082911cab9fbeff94baa7714cb ("xfs: sanitize remount options")
>
> on test machine: vm-kbuild-4G: 4 threads qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu qemu64,+ssse3 with 4G memory
>
> caused below changes:
>
>
> [ 666.729855] XFS (vdd): unknown mount option [nosuchopt].
This is expected, it's just that we're catching invalid remount options, now,
and being a bit noiser about it.
default:
xfs_warn(mp, "unknown mount option [%s].", p);
return -EINVAL;
>From tests/generic/082 :
# first remount ro with a bad option, a failed remount ro should not disable
# quota, but currently xfs doesn't fail in this case, the unknown option is
# just ignored, but quota is still on. This may change in future, let's
# re-consider the case then.
_scratch_mount "-o remount,ro,nosuchopt" >>$seqres.full 2>&1
so the test is intentionally passing in a bad mount option, and the kernel
is just letting us know.
Thanks,
-Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 1:42 [lkp] [xfs] a08ee40a79: kmsg.XFS(vdd):unknown_mount_option[nosuchopt] kernel test robot
2016-05-16 15:46 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b490c2a-505d-bba2-c4a9-b85732505dc5@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).