From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABD2C4360F for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B56C206DF for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="vcliyMVw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726607AbfDCRpO (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:45:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:51644 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726151AbfDCRpO (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:45:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 4so8393059wmf.1; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:45:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JLkGukoqV2ks5xZqU5AF00WrxKiuH39UwFo2hmZwP5U=; b=vcliyMVw3pd1vox/os+jyYFmnm3a4T2XDLTwdU5MmeD/PBKRKbCAh3yG+EgUM4eQkh UlOBVWbr8PeDHfDZ9imIH8AOUVzJL0Lw589dZhXtVb/keK0zoirSZYFKCk6NYF1FdxUH 5ooiXIzAA1tjUZgj5/2r4tVdnWo+/lX+9fnhNU5RFyXV0FvDK8TFhdj6DUjUcCaE/BLc za5qhSMNYB5xRgVjNCOiqF/Q5GUUS7coBqKq0gveT63ETV9u77nzwJlqdDJQRuXsrbBx 8XVrGM5obYaDrkvSxIjDGWTG1grOl9nu8kg+IO/DmlOuNXVS2xnIH+691sdKCI2jbkE1 TnZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JLkGukoqV2ks5xZqU5AF00WrxKiuH39UwFo2hmZwP5U=; b=n0Jgo/eX/GGULJJs6K0fY1wFy358JNBzv5HmWEK1aRcc0dffFZQ4gH31GgtoEH29/y UYbvSLbvLy1fFYVqsW9nsQfTJ5l3OM8FhZr5tqNTATFqRbCuEH0D58/TJSexUP+TsEuC Dp33UZtBG32J0pXqpwu4spzP2QEpSXlGkXYsOtTQuc8RCpX8LZXmIWMyOW3I7YCRmY86 60jqIVz6FM+GNXtLQTMZxcWtQ5h4RHZaSGHwImK9ewKex4TQNjv1euPpKEBMJC5haLTf Cw6GILFTHvJ2X+Gj7uR74yS2B9wmXZivl0kCneNF7kT+8rJweMDN8rL9tTLRL3uGVBj1 mmDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkafSPKocx2IjkXEXWVAn2JrzfFpN7BsBBRe3U7YCG5uHFSQDt RrVrxM/6bP9btY4hgJt+OVEhx8VW X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziKKAAj7LPxAjrO4F1GMEvOUHYTGOoWJeLAzp7SIx92TFNftJqq9tLATabTvQVqVCchB6tZg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:658a:: with SMTP id z132mr848821wmb.92.1554313511737; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.19] (bkr161.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.28.185.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm18085070wrx.5.2019.04.03.10.45.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove LM3532 backlight driver references To: Lee Jones Cc: Dan Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org References: <20190321142838.22985-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190321142838.22985-3-dmurphy@ti.com> <8769a95d-179f-6219-0a63-9dd623cdd297@gmail.com> <20190325075317.GW4731@dell> <20190403075709.GD11301@dell> From: Jacek Anaszewski Message-ID: <8b771488-a914-0d75-6e9b-9a67b4c5017e@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 19:45:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190403075709.GD11301@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/3/19 9:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > >> On 3/25/19 8:53 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Lee, >>>> >>>> Can we have your ack for this going via LED tree, please? >>> >>> Patch looks okay. >>> >>> You can take it through the LED, but if you do I will need you to send >>> me a pull-request to a minimised immutable branch please. >>> >>> If you cannot do this, I can apply the set and provide the same to >>> you. >>> >>> If you choose the former: >>> >>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones >>> >>> Please let me know what you decide >>> >> >> I've been exposing integration branches in the past, but after Linus' >> message [0] I have my doubts now. I wonder if it wouldn't make more >> sense if I just took the patches, and you'd cherry-pick them only in >> case such a need occurs. This way we would avoid this whole merge >> noise, which in an optimistic and very plausible case will not be needed >> at all. >> >> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/19/1104 > > That email is 2 years old, and does not seem relevant to what we're > trying to achieve. I've only ever had issues when *not* creating > immutable branches for these, cross subsystem scenarios. The > shared branches I create are always minimalist and never change. > > I'm happy to take the patches and create a suitable pull-request for > you if you are uncomfortable with the process. I just need your Ack > to do so. Up to you. I don't have any problem with the process. The clear gain of cherry picking is more linear history. And the branch can be always created when such a need occurs in linux-next. That being said, I will send you a pull request once we sort out the problem with obtaining a reference to the backlight node. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski