From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4064FC64ED6 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233717AbjBUInW (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 03:43:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59790 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233865AbjBUInJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 03:43:09 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D1723D81 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:42:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1676968940; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TLJIC/RrvVE7PdqmcHdwOf29lNkhzpC8wWHN3DTeCNY=; b=Wz1uOJ/d+VJus6ZBFOpTXsSdcn5zFazF//uj7DOYbvk0tUaFSACEkKECpSde44VrNrT/Ce bbw4rHUV+aY3ItIm2NGHhZEO08ip3Ij1KS20UZIAZbrEnlf59LTWqS2cv0X2r2Y8FebW1o TJuQvxuRnlyKKCfMnBtC3Em1NQ9/c9k= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-355-cHYO949pPUizsscreUp61Q-1; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 03:42:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: cHYO949pPUizsscreUp61Q-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 1-20020a056000154100b002c54d9b8312so636929wry.5 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:42:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TLJIC/RrvVE7PdqmcHdwOf29lNkhzpC8wWHN3DTeCNY=; b=4/XAUXnmObh26/eN0IsuT4gQX1C+p+li8G3MCt09kktqUPyNlQsVI0+xks/mBYmYF0 n6LpLX5DTvQQpmNBDX1wrXCa51PoYtvnKQSjZDs3pgP5t/tSgmfpTwxT4XkzDexil/8f 27ONFyial8YpabXng6iN8J9aPFepdfPs/HzNkIjJSp2Oa6vVM5E2OfdUSH2Og14n7rTH re+xM3T4WZQweTvXyLQFsyuOBJHnN/+PFlW3ZzZo8AA/RoFw3bxcKAw+P/1xIaZxE0iN JV+XGRdWxfQS4Zro9Dae7xS2Wo2VIiJSoQf2OQ83jJoR6WkI7qv211NKuoPmT1V44v6P IXsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUpq5Lqb0MQFPhD8lu+mQuRNpKiw4h6dNAYtvCa+0rAfD2Hw1NB bEN1HfK4b418Tw6isNcLZHeJ7JH60ALhqj16paXvxIOvt5zN57gp3Kl2N+WadpxsL7znvpMxoCj lGVTTKL9QwfcgX90S4YX99Nm4l6PYCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5308:0:b0:2c5:6025:cd65 with SMTP id e8-20020a5d5308000000b002c56025cd65mr2218699wrv.9.1676968937538; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:42:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8HYdakBP7NNr75W24EBS8ylbUTvbqe5cKGc3PV4r6NUAF4mQpJtQCSggSEkz/UdpiRyLcPVw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5308:0:b0:2c5:6025:cd65 with SMTP id e8-20020a5d5308000000b002c56025cd65mr2218684wrv.9.1676968937186; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:42:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c707:4800:aecc:dadb:40a8:ce81? (p200300cbc7074800aeccdadb40a8ce81.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c707:4800:aecc:dadb:40a8:ce81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c24-20020a7bc858000000b003e11ad0750csm1147194wml.47.2023.02.21.00.42.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:42:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8b8ffa43-9003-010d-30ea-c5de128d646d@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:42:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 24/41] mm: Don't allow write GUPs to shadow stack memory Content-Language: en-US To: Rick Edgecombe , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com, christina.schimpe@intel.com, debug@rivosinc.com References: <20230218211433.26859-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20230218211433.26859-25-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20230218211433.26859-25-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.02.23 22:14, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > The x86 Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) feature includes a new > type of memory called shadow stack. This shadow stack memory has some > unusual properties, which requires some core mm changes to function > properly. > > Shadow stack memory is writable only in very specific, controlled ways. > However, since it is writable, the kernel treats it as such. As a result > there remain many ways for userspace to trigger the kernel to write to > shadow stack's via get_user_pages(, FOLL_WRITE) operations. To make this a > little less exposed, block writable GUPs for shadow stack VMAs. > > Still allow FOLL_FORCE to write through shadow stack protections, as it > does for read-only protections. > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > Tested-by: Pengfei Xu > Tested-by: John Allen > Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe > > --- > v3: > - Add comment in __pte_access_permitted() (Dave) > - Remove unneeded shadow stack specific check in > __pte_access_permitted() (Jann) > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++ > mm/gup.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h > index 6b7106457bfb..20d0df494269 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -1641,6 +1641,11 @@ static inline bool __pte_access_permitted(unsigned long pteval, bool write) > { > unsigned long need_pte_bits = _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_USER; > > + /* > + * Write=0,Dirty=1 PTEs are shadow stack, which the kernel > + * shouldn't generally allow access to, but since they > + * are already Write=0, the below logic covers both cases. > + */ > if (write) > need_pte_bits |= _PAGE_RW; So, GUP fast will always fail when writing ... > > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c > index f45a3a5be53a..bfd33d9edb89 100644 > --- a/mm/gup.c > +++ b/mm/gup.c > @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags) > return -EFAULT; > > if (write) { > - if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) { > + if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE) || (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) { > if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE)) > return -EFAULT; > /* hugetlb does not support FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE. */ and ordinary GUP without FOLL_FORCE. Acked-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb