linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2: Remove a useless spinlock
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ba7004d330cbe5f626539a8a3bff696d0c4285e.1658224839.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd6796635e58f9c47cf857573c3b9474a00ce26a.1658224839.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

'node_map_lock' is a spinlock only used to protect calls to set_bit(),
clear_bit() and test_bit().

{set|clear}_bit() are already atomic and don't need this extra spinlock.
test_bit() only reads the bitmap for a given bit.

Remove this useless spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
test_bit() is NOT documented as an atomic function. However, I can't see
how it could return a wrong result here.

So review with care. There is maybe something I don't think about that is
lurking here.
---
 fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c | 11 ++++-------
 fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h     |  2 --
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c b/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c
index 1d72e0788943..4863ad35c242 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ static void ocfs2_node_map_init(struct ocfs2_node_map *map)
 
 void ocfs2_init_node_maps(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
 {
-	spin_lock_init(&osb->node_map_lock);
 	ocfs2_node_map_init(&osb->osb_recovering_orphan_dirs);
 }
 
@@ -67,9 +66,8 @@ void ocfs2_node_map_set_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
 	if (bit==-1)
 		return;
 	BUG_ON(bit >= map->num_nodes);
-	spin_lock(&osb->node_map_lock);
+
 	set_bit(bit, map->map);
-	spin_unlock(&osb->node_map_lock);
 }
 
 void ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
@@ -79,9 +77,8 @@ void ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
 	if (bit==-1)
 		return;
 	BUG_ON(bit >= map->num_nodes);
-	spin_lock(&osb->node_map_lock);
+
 	clear_bit(bit, map->map);
-	spin_unlock(&osb->node_map_lock);
 }
 
 int ocfs2_node_map_test_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
@@ -89,13 +86,13 @@ int ocfs2_node_map_test_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
 			    int bit)
 {
 	int ret;
+
 	if (bit >= map->num_nodes) {
 		mlog(ML_ERROR, "bit=%d map->num_nodes=%d\n", bit, map->num_nodes);
 		BUG();
 	}
-	spin_lock(&osb->node_map_lock);
+
 	ret = test_bit(bit, map->map);
-	spin_unlock(&osb->node_map_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
index 740b64238312..1df193b97c30 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
@@ -302,8 +302,6 @@ struct ocfs2_super
 
 	u32 *slot_recovery_generations;
 
-	spinlock_t node_map_lock;
-
 	u64 root_blkno;
 	u64 system_dir_blkno;
 	u64 bitmap_blkno;
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-19 10:01 [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: Remove some useless functions Christophe JAILLET
2022-07-19 10:01 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2022-07-19 10:24   ` [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2: Remove a useless spinlock David Laight
2022-07-19 13:25     ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-07-19 14:19       ` David Laight
2022-07-20  1:59       ` Joseph Qi
2022-07-20  8:26         ` Marion & Christophe JAILLET
2022-07-20  9:48           ` Joseph Qi
2022-07-20 13:32             ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-07-21  1:53               ` Joseph Qi
2022-07-19 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] ocfs2: use the bitmap API to simplify code Christophe JAILLET
2022-07-20  2:06   ` Joseph Qi
2022-07-20  2:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: Remove some useless functions Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ba7004d330cbe5f626539a8a3bff696d0c4285e.1658224839.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).