From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756470AbZDWQbM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:31:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750741AbZDWQbA (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:31:00 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.226]:36324 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352AbZDWQa7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:30:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MWWSrplw9HHdn1p9NbylTCMFoOpoCueu4QqdKNY3nk8KMQCl4ky7C8VPOCszVYprYD 3skakE4Jsk8n8jw/sOdaWgIzjrcMK/9ucytZqDjcyXNBHKueUwGSY9+j9BOb1IUhnnzo pJcpY02DYhZpGp5J3FD6gSLQScBVqN2C6vwuA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090423173728.4fa010fa@i1501.lan.towertech.it> References: <1239036633-10032-1-git-send-email-anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20090409153921.04b6384c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090410005820.4fcfcc1f@i1501.lan.towertech.it> <20090423.235141.61509229.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20090423170253.6b6dfd21@i1501.lan.towertech.it> <8bd0f97a0904230807q6c40436wa561d7b26db26cef@mail.gmail.com> <20090423173728.4fa010fa@i1501.lan.towertech.it> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:30:58 -0400 Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0904230930w7c9ffaa4x5110c59098ff475b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with irqs enabled From: Mike Frysinger To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Atsushi Nemoto , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hcegtvedt@atmel.com, vapier@gentoo.org, rongkai.zhan@windriver.com, balajirrao@openmoko.org, david-b@pacbell.net, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:37, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:07:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> we just removed the shared bit from the Blackfin rtc driver because it >> didnt really make sense for us.  i need to test something else, so is >> the only change you need is the one posted originally ?  that makes >> more sense to me than forcing everyone to use IRQF_DISABLED. > >  for the blackfin you should just check if >  you have locking issues in your irq routine the Blackfin driver calls rtc_update_irq() from its IRQ handler and the handler is not registered with IRQF_DISABLED. it makes more sense to me to fix rtc_update_irq() than require all RTC drivers to register with IRQF_DISABLED. especially in my case as the Blackfin driver itself doesnt need any locks. -mike