From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:09:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c655adc-6d9e-b767-1024-5d6941c995a9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720163712.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 07/20/2018 12:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:19:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> I am not against the idea of making it hierarchical eventually. I am
>> just hoping to get thing going by merging the patchset in its current
>> form and then we can make it hierarchical in a followup patch.
> Where's the rush? Why can't we do this right in one go?
For me, the rush comes from RHEL8 as it is a goal to have a fully
functioning cgroup v2 in that release.
I also believe that most of the use cases of partition can be satisfied
with partitions at the first level children. Getting hierarchical
partition right may drag on for half a year, maybe, giving our history
with cpu v2 controller. No matter what we do to enable hierarchical
partition in the future, the current model of using a partition flag is
intuitive enough that it won't be changed at least for the first level
children.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-24 7:30 [PATCH v11 0/9] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] " Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.partition flag Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] cpuset: Simulate auto-off of sched.partition at cgroup removal Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] cpuset: Allow changes to cpus in a partition root Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] cpuset: Make sure that partition flag work properly with CPU hotplug Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize reserved_cpus Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root Waiman Long
2018-07-02 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-03 0:41 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-03 15:58 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-06 20:32 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-10 15:23 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-18 15:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-18 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-18 21:12 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-19 14:04 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 15:52 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 17:22 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 17:38 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:45 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 12:04 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 15:56 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 16:19 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 17:09 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-07-20 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-13 17:56 ` Waiman Long
2018-08-17 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-18 1:03 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-27 21:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 15:57 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] cpuset: Don't rebuild sched domains if cpu changes in non-partition root Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] cpuset: Allow reporting of sched domain generation info Waiman Long
2018-07-19 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-19 13:56 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c655adc-6d9e-b767-1024-5d6941c995a9@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).