From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753019AbcLES3d (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:29:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wj0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:34477 "EHLO mail-wj0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752993AbcLES32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:29:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net 10/20] net/ena: remove redundant logic in napi callback for busy poll mode To: Eric Dumazet References: <1480857578-5065-1-git-send-email-netanel@annapurnalabs.com> <1480857578-5065-11-git-send-email-netanel@annapurnalabs.com> <1480916739.18162.516.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dwmw@amazon.com, zorik@annapurnalabs.com, alex@annapurnalabs.com, saeed@annapurnalabs.com, msw@amazon.com, aliguori@amazon.com, nafea@annapurnalabs.com From: Netanel Belgazal Message-ID: <8c6eb7b9-c9fc-60f6-c890-5d69c0cc1cd9@annapurnalabs.com> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:29:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1480916739.18162.516.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/05/2016 07:45 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 15:19 +0200, Netanel Belgazal wrote: >> sk_busy_loop can call the napi callback few million times a sec. >> For each call there is unmask interrupt. >> We want to reduce the number of unmasks. >> >> Add an atomic variable that will tell the napi handler if >> it was called from irq context or not. >> Unmask the interrupt only from irq context. >> >> A schenario where the driver left with missed unmask isn't feasible. >> when ena_intr_msix_io is called the driver have 2 options: >> 1)Before napi completes and call napi_complete_done >> 2)After calling napi_complete_done >> >> In the former case the napi will unmask the interrupt as needed. >> In the latter case napi_complete_done will remove napi from the schedule >> list so napi will be rescheduled (by ena_intr_msix_io) and interrupt >> will be unmasked as desire in the 2nd napi call. >> >> Signed-off-by: Netanel Belgazal >> --- > > This looks very complicated to me. > > I guess you missed the recent patches that happened on net-next ? You are correct. I didn't see the patches. It is much better to use the napi_complete_done() return value. I'll rework my patch. > > 2e713283751f494596655d9125c168aeb913f71d net/mlx4_en: use napi_complete_done() return value > 364b6055738b4c752c30ccaaf25c624e69d76195 net: busy-poll: return busypolling status to drivers > 21cb84c48ca0619181106f0f44f3802a989de024 net: busy-poll: remove need_resched() from sk_can_busy_loop() > 217f6974368188fd8bd7804bf5a036aa5762c5e4 net: busy-poll: allow preemption in sk_busy_loop() > > napi_complete_done() return code can be used by a driver, > no need to add yet another atomic operation in fast path. > > Anyway, this looks wrong : > > @@ -1186,6 +1201,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ena_intr_msix_io(int irq, void *data) > { > struct ena_napi *ena_napi = data; > > + atomic_set(&ena_napi->unmask_interrupt, 1); > napi_schedule(&ena_napi->napi); > > You probably wanted : > > if (napi_schedule_prep(n)) { > atomic_set(&ena_napi->unmask_interrupt, 1); > __napi_schedule(n); > } > > > > Please rework this napi poll using core infrastructure. > > busypoll logic should be centralized, not reimplemented in different ways in a driver. > > Thanks. > > >