From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965743AbXCLL6O (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:58:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965739AbXCLL6O (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:58:14 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:25971 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965743AbXCLL6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:58:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=jHdPSUT9VVnQwWdcNW0Wy8yF3RxLdmRW2gUtqqqCuoSK+mnn5pgWveMTYqFEKT72IoFrglJ4Jky9BjfrdqQwHLt/n1lfvVB7HncZrH2tkTVk7mhwIJyS2x6rBtS5khjS5y18ynJW+yAeDxdDeQvmcaj+zqcMufbvv1Z66L9J+oU= Message-ID: <8cd998d50703120458j6ac9f33h79728f2f599a3b91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:58:11 +1100 From: "Con Kolivas" To: "Gene Heskett" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Radoslaw Szkodzinski" , "Mike Galbraith" , "ck list" , "Andrew Morton" , "Ingo Molnar" In-Reply-To: <200703120749.39303.gene.heskett@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200703111457.17624.kernel@kolivas.org> <200703120716.03519.gene.heskett@gmail.com> <200703120749.39303.gene.heskett@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ac85079c77962bf2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/03/07, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: > >To Con, I knew 2.6.20 worked with your earlier patches, so rather than > >revert all the way, I just rebooted to 2.6.20.2-rdsl-0.30 and I'm going > >to fire off another backup. I suspect it will work, but will advise the > >next time I wake up. > > After posting the above, I thought maybe I'd hit a target in the middle > and build a 2.6.20.2, with your -0.30 patch, but... > > I'm going to have to build a 2.6.20.2, because with the rdsl-0.30 patch, > its going to do a level 2 on my /usr/movies directory, which hasn't been > touched in 90 days and has about 8.1GB in it according to du, and its > going to do nearly all of it. It shouldn't be anything but a directory > listing file. But this is what amstatus is reporting: > coyote:/usr/movies 2 7271m dumping 793m ( 10.91%) > (7:26:00) > > And its also reporting far more data than exists it seems. As is du, > for /var, which might have 2 gigs, its claiming 3.7! > > Honest folks, I'm not smoking anything, I quit 18 years ago. Back to bed > while this one bombs out too. > > -- > Cheers, Gene Gene your last good kernel you said was 2.6.20 based. I don't see a good reason even to use 2.6.20.2 as a base given that information. -- -ck