linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: fix phys_to_virt() false positive on tag-based kasan
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:06:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8df7ec20-2fd2-8076-9a34-ac4c9785e91a@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819133441.ejomv6cprdcz7hh6@willie-the-truck>



On 8/19/19 4:34 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:56:26PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 07:44:20PM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
>>>> __arm_v7s_unmap() call iopte_deref() to translate pyh_to_virt address,
>>>> but it will modify pointer tag into 0xff, so there is a false positive.
>>>>
>>>> When enable tag-based kasan, phys_to_virt() function need to rewrite
>>>> its original pointer tag in order to avoid kasan report an incorrect
>>>> memory corruption.
>>>
>>> Hmm. Which tree did you see this on? We've recently queued a load of fixes
>>> in this area, but I /thought/ they were only needed after the support for
>>> 52-bit virtual addressing in the kernel.
>>
>> I'm seeing similar issues in the virtio blk code (splat below), atop of
>> the arm64 for-next/core branch. I think this is a latent issue, and
>> people are only just starting to test with KASAN_SW_TAGS.
>>
>> It looks like the virtio blk code will round-trip a SLUB-allocated pointer from
>> virt->page->virt, losing the per-object tag in the process.
>>
>> Our page_to_virt() seems to get a per-page tag, but this only makes
>> sense if you're dealing with the page allocator, rather than something
>> like SLUB which carves a page into smaller objects giving each object a
>> distinct tag.
>>
>> Any round-trip of a pointer from SLUB is going to lose the per-object
>> tag.
> 
> Urgh, I wonder how this is supposed to work?
> 

We supposed to ignore pointers with 0xff tags. We do ignore them when memory access checked,
but not in kfree() path.
This untested patch should fix the issue:



---
 mm/kasan/common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index 895dc5e2b3d5..0a81cc328049 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/common.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static inline bool shadow_invalid(u8 tag, s8 shadow_byte)
 		return shadow_byte < 0 ||
 			shadow_byte >= KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE;
 	else
-		return tag != (u8)shadow_byte;
+		return (tag != KASAN_TAG_KERNEL) && (tag != (u8)shadow_byte);
 }
 
 static bool __kasan_slab_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object,
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19 11:44 [PATCH] arm64: kasan: fix phys_to_virt() false positive on tag-based kasan Walter Wu
2019-08-19 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 13:23   ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 13:34     ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 14:05       ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-19 14:22         ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 14:35           ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-19 14:43             ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 15:03         ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 15:37           ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-19 16:03             ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 14:06       ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2019-08-19 14:21         ` Walter Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8df7ec20-2fd2-8076-9a34-ac4c9785e91a@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).