From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AF0C43464 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8FA20672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726198AbgIRBVi (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:21:38 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:62750 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgIRBVi (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:21:38 -0400 IronPort-SDR: YnJxwXYTJ4lORONpDNVzAsat0SF74NcgpwYaIeqTwAxPgV9PLEs1hjR0KbIZQoRXITLSBnA6yC tOVAEkV32hdw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9747"; a="157215920" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,273,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="157215920" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2020 18:21:33 -0700 IronPort-SDR: vXUNcEFSqy2OWFuk6SZi+9xvIiTpHw2DjXVCXTlv+HPfBkIJj177JWUZw3mthx3BPOT1ESgeWj /Jd4PqPypNXg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,273,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="483979420" Received: from yjin15-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.5.239]) ([10.238.5.239]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2020 18:21:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list From: "Jin, Yao" To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ian Rogers , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , LKML , Andi Kleen , kan.liang@intel.com, "Jin, Yao" , Stephane Eranian References: <20200603021818.27028-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <911b4132-d1a1-f3c4-a2ed-2fcfe9a28fc6@linux.intel.com> <20200616193856.GC6393@kernel.org> <681a333b-e4dc-9481-715e-a65a34e10f83@linux.intel.com> <82271c45-4a7d-d892-eccd-ed042b86a333@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <8ed53667-8241-1c58-ac2c-ecc9e9870afd@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:21:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82271c45-4a7d-d892-eccd-ed042b86a333@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnaldo, On 9/7/2020 4:01 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: > Hi Arnaldo, > > On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >>>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao wrote: >>>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset? >>>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote: >>>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and >>>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21. >>> >>>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX >>>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch. >>> >>>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree? >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core >>>>> I tried using git am but get: >>>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@ >>>>> error: could not build fake ancestor >>>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>> >>>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch. >>>> >>>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right? >>> >>> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more >>> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly >>> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge >>> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to >>> rebase it like before. >>> >>> - Arnaldo >>> >> >> Can this event update be accepted? >> >> Thanks >> Jin Yao > > Can this event list update be accepted? > > Thanks > Jin Yao Ping again. :) Can this event update patchset be accepted? @Ian, I remembered you had tried this patchset and it's OK right? Thanks Jin Yao