From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1035203AbdAISri (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:47:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34800 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932422AbdAISrf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:47:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder To: Hans Verkuil , Rick Chang References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479894203.8964.29.camel@mtksdaap41> <1483670099.18931.5.camel@mtksdaap41> <974d20f3-5133-0869-2a35-c1617bec5d6e@xs4all.nl> Cc: Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Minghsiu Tsai , James Liao From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <8eefb7b1-94a9-feb5-3d69-51563b2e9d5e@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:47:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/01/17 19:45, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Hi Rick, >> >> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you >>> have >>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could >>> merge >>> the source code and dt-binding first? >> >> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is >> the reason >> it hasn't been merged yet? >> >> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging >> this media >> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro >> can handle. >> >> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until >> it is >> merged. >> > > I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems > that it got never posted. > > Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds > a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? > Ah I forgot, dts patches should go through my tree, so Hans please don't merge this patch. Bindings should go through your branch though. Thanks, Matthias