From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entries
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:45:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fd7ce61-d8eb-6bde-7d41-54b9920e3e39@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200204123629.GO14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/4/20 7:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
> @@ -278,9 +278,11 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> seq_printf(m, " dependency chains: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
> lock_chain_count(), MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
> - seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
> - MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS - nr_free_chain_hlocks,
> + seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks used: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
> + MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS - (nr_free_chain_hlocks - nr_lost_chain_hlocks),
> MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS);
> + seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks free: %11lu\n", nr_free_chain_hlocks);
> + seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks lost: %11lu\n", nr_lost_chain_hlocks);
I do have some comments on this. There are three buckets now - free,
lost, used. They add up to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS. I don't think we
need to list all three. We can compute the third one by subtracting max
from the other two.
Something like:
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 14932ea50317..6fe6a21c58d3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -278,9 +278,12 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m,
void *v)
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
seq_printf(m, " dependency chains: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
lock_chain_count(), MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
- seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
- MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS - nr_free_chain_hlocks,
+ seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks used: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
+ MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS -
+ (nr_free_chain_hlocks + nr_lost_chain_hlocks),
MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS);
+ seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks lost: %11lu\n",
+ nr_lost_chain_hlocks);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/7] locking/lockdep: Reuse zapped chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters when removing lock chain Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] locking/lockdep: Display irq_context names in /proc/lockdep_chains Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped classes Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] locking/lockdep: Throw away all lock chains with zapped class Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped lock chains Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2020-02-04 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-04 14:54 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-04 16:45 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2020-02-05 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-05 13:59 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-04 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-04 16:12 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-04 16:26 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-04 16:57 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-05 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-05 14:03 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-03 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] locking/lockdep: Add a fast path for chain_hlocks allocation Waiman Long
2020-02-04 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-04 15:07 ` Waiman Long
2020-02-04 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-04 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-04 18:02 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fd7ce61-d8eb-6bde-7d41-54b9920e3e39@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).