From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261501AbTCOTcv>; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:32:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261503AbTCOTcv>; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:32:51 -0500
Received: from khms.westfalen.de ([62.153.201.243]:59564 "EHLO
	khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261501AbTCOTct>; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:32:49 -0500
Date: 15 Mar 2003 12:47:00 +0200
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <8htxsNF1w-B@khms.westfalen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20030309001008$6342@gated-at.bofh.it>
Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh10 R/C435
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
References: <20030309001008$2ed5@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030309001008$4e61@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030309001008$0732@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030309001008$747c@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030309001008$6342@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)  wrote on 09.03.03 in <20030309001008$6342@gated-at.bofh.it>:

> [Long rant, summary: it's harder than you think, read on for the details]

This thread has certainly convinced *me* that the only way to *really*  
solve this problem is by finding a better way of looking at the problem,  
finding a better model/abstraction/whatever.

Of course, finding that isn't particularly easy either. But with such a  
thing, *most* (certainly not all) of the current hard problems should just  
"fall out" naturally.

That may, of course, mean that some current fundamental assumption isn't  
really as fundamental as we think right now. But it's hard to speculate  
before having actually found the above new view of the problem!

Time to let the subconscious work on it more than time to code, I think.

MfG Kai