From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6EFC5519F for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D89D20B80 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726221AbgKMBBX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:01:23 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:10942 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725965AbgKMBBW (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:01:22 -0500 IronPort-SDR: 5Dx8NFtyqsGTBeGog/Engpc5K+nSlTLuEHhAMMihelAtV3RVzA/7vYEqxeklUHP+Qpmptoe4Wr bkr5ez/aAOTQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9803"; a="170576609" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,473,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="170576609" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Nov 2020 17:01:14 -0800 IronPort-SDR: UTyCa1TTlO3Scx0RkJ2KoBpkmPVK0edGxutARnjcBJ/P3wunH0pyc2qGDybmyyKjlkhru56qc4 NWDhKmqymz2A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,473,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="309009253" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2020 17:01:14 -0800 Received: from shsmsx603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:01:13 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:01:11 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:01:11 +0800 From: "Li, Philip" To: Jakub Kicinski CC: lkp , Dmytro Shytyi , kuznet , yoshfuji , liuhangbin , davem , netdev , linux-kernel , "kbuild-all@lists.01.org" Subject: RE: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO Thread-Topic: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO Thread-Index: AQHWt8rnymHV+oRFv0+mSedV58/YYKnEsPmAgACHjsD//3/5gIAAhmeA Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:01:11 +0000 Message-ID: <905a3ef02edb4aa9883ae4d6080120a9@intel.com> References: <175b3433a4c.aea7c06513321.4158329434310691736@shytyi.net> <202011110944.7zNVZmvB-lkp@intel.com> <20201112162423.6b4de8d1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <5bc4f8ce9a6c40029043bc902a38af25@intel.com> <20201112165119.54bd07ee@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20201112165119.54bd07ee@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:32:55 +0000 Li, Philip wrote: > > > Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC > with > > > prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > > > Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say > > > that the tag is only appropriate if someone is sending a fix up/follow > > > up patch? > > Thanks for the input, based on your suggestion how about > > > > Kindly add below tag as appropriate if you send a fix up/follow up patch > > I'm not sure myself how best to phrase it, I'm not a native speaker. > How about: > > Kindly add below tag if you send a new patch solely addressing this issue Thanks, we will consider this, and provide update next week to gather more inputs. If anyone has further suggestion, it will be very welcome. There did have some confusion and discussed earlier actually regarding when/how to add the Reported-by, thus we use appropriate to let developer decide the best choice for his own situation. But if it leads to confusion, we will keep looking for a better way. BTW: if we just remove this message line, and leave below Reported-by only, would it be a good choice? > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > Or any wording change suggestion to make it more clear/friendly?