linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>, tj@kernel.org
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] blk-cgroup: Use cond_resched() when destroy blkgs
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:32:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9087d02b-ef9b-46c4-6933-82bb3e520597@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0be1a0a03367f7230497a2e7a5ed47d2a2d5ae1a.1611809091.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On 1/27/21 10:58 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On !PREEMPT kernel, we can get below softlockup when doing stress
> testing with creating and destroying block cgroup repeatly. The
> reason is it may take a long time to acquire the queue's lock in
> the loop of blkcg_destroy_blkgs(), or the system can accumulate a
> huge number of blkgs in pathological cases. We can add a need_resched()
> check on each loop and release locks and do cond_resched() if true
> to avoid this issue, since the blkcg_destroy_blkgs() is not called
> from atomic contexts.
> 
> [ 4757.010308] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#11 stuck for 94s!
> [ 4757.010698] Call trace:
> [ 4757.010700]  blkcg_destroy_blkgs+0x68/0x150
> [ 4757.010701]  cgwb_release_workfn+0x104/0x158
> [ 4757.010702]  process_one_work+0x1bc/0x3f0
> [ 4757.010704]  worker_thread+0x164/0x468
> [ 4757.010705]  kthread+0x108/0x138

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28  5:58 [PATCH v3] blk-cgroup: Use cond_resched() when destroy blkgs Baolin Wang
2021-01-28 14:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9087d02b-ef9b-46c4-6933-82bb3e520597@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).