From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: tegra20: Enable lock-status polling for PLLs
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:45:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <909e2a52-4116-9ee7-db23-8ea1dfffade0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831092948.GP1636@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
On 8/31/18 12:29 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:42:10PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Currently all PLL's on Tegra20 use a hardcoded delay despite of having
>> a lock-status bit. The lock-status polling was disabled ~7 years ago
>> because PLLE was failing to lock and was a suspicion that other PLLs
>> might be faulty too. Other PLLs are okay, hence enable the lock-status
>> polling for them. This reduces delay of any operation that require PLL
>> to lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v2: Don't enable polling for PLLE as it known to not being able to lock.
>>
>
> This isn't correct. The lock bit of PLLE can declare lock too early, but the
> PLL itself does lock.
Indeed, it locks but can't be polled for the lock-status as it doesn't have the
lock-status bit.
Do you want me to adjust the commit description or it is fine as is?
It is also a bit odd that PLLE has "lock_delay = 0", is it correct?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-31 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 18:42 [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: tegra: Don't enable already enabled PLLs Dmitry Osipenko
2018-08-30 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: tegra20: Enable lock-status polling for PLLs Dmitry Osipenko
2018-08-31 9:29 ` Peter De Schrijver
2018-08-31 9:45 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2018-09-03 8:01 ` Peter De Schrijver
2018-09-04 9:06 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-17 11:52 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-06 12:13 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2018-10-17 10:59 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2018-10-17 11:41 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-12-10 0:58 ` Dmitry Osipenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=909e2a52-4116-9ee7-db23-8ea1dfffade0@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).