From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, guro@fb.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, yang.s@alibaba-inc.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg, oom: throttle dump_header for memcg ooms without eligible tasks
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 21:10:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9174f087-3f6f-f0ed-6009-509d4436a47a@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181012120858.GX5873@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 2018/10/12 21:08, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> So not more than 10 dumps in each 5s interval. That looks reasonable
>> to me. By the time it starts dropping data you have more than enough
>> information to go on already.
>
> Yeah. Unless we have a storm coming from many different cgroups in
> parallel. But even then we have the allocation context for each OOM so
> we are not losing everything. Should we ever tune this, it can be done
> later with some explicit examples.
>
>> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>
> Thanks! I will post the patch to Andrew early next week.
>
How do you handle environments where one dump takes e.g. 3 seconds?
Counting delay between first message in previous dump and first message
in next dump is not safe. Unless we count delay between last message
in previous dump and first message in next dump, we cannot guarantee
that the system won't lockup due to printk() flooding.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-10 0:08 INFO: rcu detected stall in shmem_fault syzbot
2018-10-10 0:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-10 4:11 ` David Rientjes
2018-10-10 7:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 9:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 9:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 10:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-10 11:35 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 11:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-10 12:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 12:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 12:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 13:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-10 13:17 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-11 1:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-10 15:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-10 14:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-10 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH] memcg, oom: throttle dump_header for memcg ooms without eligible tasks Michal Hocko
2018-10-11 6:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-12 10:47 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-12 11:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-10-12 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-12 12:10 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2018-10-12 12:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-10-12 12:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-13 11:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-13 11:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-10-13 11:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-15 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-15 10:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-15 11:24 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-15 12:47 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-15 13:35 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-16 0:55 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-16 9:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-16 11:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-10-16 11:17 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9174f087-3f6f-f0ed-6009-509d4436a47a@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).