linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chiqijun <chiqijun@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Yinshi (Stone)" <yin.yinshi@huawei.com>,
	"Wangxiaoyun (Cloud)" <cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>,
	zengweiliang zengweiliang <zengweiliang.zengweiliang@huawei.com>,
	"Chenlizhong (IT Chip)" <chenlizhong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add pci reset quirk for Huawei Intelligent NIC virtual function
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:18:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9232bf61-8906-0848-8078-a2c6b6a78864@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130084622.0b71d526@w520.home>



On 2020/11/30 23:46, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:29:19 -0600
> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>> [+cc Alex]
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 02:18:25PM +0800, Chiqijun wrote:
>>> When multiple VFs do FLR at the same time, the firmware is
>>> processed serially, resulting in some VF FLRs being delayed more
>>> than 100ms, when the virtual machine restarts and the device
>>> driver is loaded, the firmware is doing the corresponding VF
>>> FLR, causing the driver to fail to load.
>>>
>>> To solve this problem, add host and firmware status synchronization
>>> during FLR.
>>
>> Is this because the Huawei Intelligent NIC isn't following the spec,
>> or is it because Linux isn't correctly waiting for the FLR to
>> complete?
> 
> Seems like a spec compliance issue, I don't recall anything in the spec
> about coordinating FLR between VFs.

The spec stipulates that the FLR time of a single VF does not exceed 
100ms, but when multiple VMs are reset concurrently in Linux, there will 
be multiple VF parallel FLRs, VF of Huawei Intelligent NIC
  FLR will exceed 100ms in this case.

>   
>> If this is a Huawei Intelligent NIC defect, is there documentation
>> somewhere (errata) that you can reference?  Will it be fixed in future
>> designs, so we don't have to add future Device IDs to the quirk?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chiqijun <chiqijun@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/pci/quirks.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>> index f70692ac79c5..bd6236ea9064 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>> @@ -3912,6 +3912,71 @@ static int delay_250ms_after_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
>>>   	return 0;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HINIC_VF  0x375E
>>> +#define HINIC_VF_FLR_TYPE       0x1000
>>> +#define HINIC_VF_OP             0xE80
>>> +#define HINIC_OPERATION_TIMEOUT 15000
>>> +
>>> +/* Device-specific reset method for Huawei Intelligent NIC virtual functions */
>>> +static int reset_hinic_vf_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, int probe)
>>> +{
>>> +	unsigned long timeout;
>>> +	void __iomem *bar;
>>> +	u16 old_command;
>>> +	u32 val;
>>> +
>>> +	if (probe)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	bar = pci_iomap(pdev, 0, 0);
>>> +	if (!bar)
>>> +		return -ENOTTY;
>>> +
>>> +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &old_command);
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * FLR cap bit bit30, FLR ACK bit: bit18, to avoid big-endian conversion
>>> +	 * the big-endian bit6, bit10 is directly operated here
>>> +	 */
>>> +	val = readl(bar + HINIC_VF_FLR_TYPE);
>>> +	if (!(val & (1UL << 6))) {
>>> +		pci_iounmap(pdev, bar);
>>> +		return -ENOTTY;
>>> +	}
> 
> 
> I don't know exactly what this is testing, but it seems like a
> feature/capability test that can fail, why is it not done as part of
> the probe?  Can we define bit 6 with a macro?  Same for bit 10 in the
> VF op register below.

The firmware of Huawei Intelligent NIC does not support this feature in 
the old version. here is the reading ability to determine whether the 
firmware supports it.
In the next patch, I will add a comment here and replace bit 6 and bit 
10 with macro definitions.

> 
>>> +
>>> +	val = readl(bar + HINIC_VF_OP);
>>> +	val = val | (1UL << 10);
>>> +	writel(val, bar + HINIC_VF_OP);
>>> +
>>> +	/* Perform the actual device function reset */
>>> +	pcie_flr(pdev);
>>> +
>>> +	pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
>>> +			      old_command | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
>>> +
>>> +	/* Waiting for device reset complete */
>>> +	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HINIC_OPERATION_TIMEOUT);
> 
> Yikes, 15s timeout!

Huawei Intelligent NIC supports a maximum of 496 VFs, so the total 
timeout period is set to 15s, which will not reach the timeout time 
under normal circumstances.

> 
>>> +	do {
>>> +		val = readl(bar + HINIC_VF_OP);
>>> +		if (!(val & (1UL << 10)))
>>> +			goto reset_complete;
>>> +		msleep(20);
>>> +	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
>>> +
>>> +	val = readl(bar + HINIC_VF_OP);
>>> +	if (!(val & (1UL << 10)))
>>> +		goto reset_complete;
>>> +
>>> +	pci_warn(pdev, "Reset dev timeout, flr ack reg: %x\n",
>>> +		 be32_to_cpu(val));
>>> +
>>> +reset_complete:
>>> +	pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, old_command);
>>> +	pci_iounmap(pdev, bar);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static const struct pci_dev_reset_methods pci_dev_reset_methods[] = {
>>>   	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82599_SFP_VF,
>>>   		 reset_intel_82599_sfp_virtfn },
>>> @@ -3923,6 +3988,8 @@ static const struct pci_dev_reset_methods pci_dev_reset_methods[] = {
>>>   	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0953, delay_250ms_after_flr },
>>>   	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_CHELSIO, PCI_ANY_ID,
>>>   		reset_chelsio_generic_dev },
>>> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HINIC_VF,
>>> +		reset_hinic_vf_dev },
>>>   	{ 0 }
>>>   };
>>>   
>>> -- 
>>> 2.17.1
>>>    
>>
> 
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-28  6:18 [PATCH] PCI: Add pci reset quirk for Huawei Intelligent NIC virtual function Chiqijun
2020-11-28 23:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-30 15:46   ` Alex Williamson
2020-12-02  9:18     ` Chiqijun [this message]
2020-12-02 17:46       ` Alex Williamson
2020-12-03 11:29         ` Chiqijun
2020-12-03 23:56           ` Alex Williamson
2020-12-02 20:18       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-03 11:32         ` Chiqijun
2020-12-02  8:57   ` Chiqijun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9232bf61-8906-0848-8078-a2c6b6a78864@huawei.com \
    --to=chiqijun@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chenlizhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yin.yinshi@huawei.com \
    --cc=zengweiliang.zengweiliang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).