Re: [PATCH] scripts: checkpatch: Check block comments start with /* empty line outside net

[Alex Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>]

On 3/17/19 11:48 AM, Alex Ghiti wrote:
> On 3/6/19 7:12 AM, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>> Le 3/6/19 à 12:08 AM, Joe Perches a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 13:02 -0500, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>>>> This patch ensures that apart from net code, block comments start 
>>>> with an
>>>> empty /* line.
>>> I'm not sure it's useful to try to eliminate these types
>>> of lines as there are ~20K of them in the kernel
>>>
>>> $ git grep -P "^\/\*\s*\S" | \
>>>    grep -v "\*/\s*$" | \
>>>    grep -vP "^(drivers/net|net/)" | \
>>>    grep -vP "\/\*\**$" | \
>>>    wc -l
>>> 19437
>>
>>
>> This is part of the coding style, some people rely on checkpatch for 
>> this matter,
>> so I think we should at least warn user, that would avoid patch 
>> bouncing.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Also, perhaps the code would be simpler using something like:
>>> ---
>>>   scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>>> index d0001fd1112d..c62dbd440c50 100755
>>> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>>> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>>> @@ -3262,6 +3262,17 @@ sub process {
>>>                    "networking block comments don't use an empty /* 
>>> line, use /* Comment...\n" . $hereprev);
>>>           }
>>>   +# Block comments use an initial blank /* unless self contained 
>>> single line
>>> +# or a continuous header line like /**********************
>>> +# This also allows for introductory kernel-doc /** lines
>>> +        if ($realfile !~ m@(?:drivers/net|net/)@ &&
>>> +            $rawline =~ m@^\+\s*/\*(?:\s*\*++)?\s*\S@ &&
>>> +            $rawline !~ m@\*/\s*$@ &&
>>> +            $realline > 2) {
>>> +            WARN("BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE",
>>> +                 "Block comments start with only /* on an otherwise 
>>> blank line\n" . $herecurr);
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>>   # Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>>>           if ($prevline =~ /$;[ \t]*$/ && #ends in comment
>>>               $prevrawline =~ /^\+.*?\/\*/ && #starting /*
>>>
>>>
>> Your version handles more cases, but why is it simpler ? Anyway, 
>> that's ok for me
>> if you prefer your version.
>>
>> Thanks for your comments,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Can I do something more regarding this patch ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
Hi,

Sorry for insisting, but do you consider this patch for inclusion ?

Thanks,

Alex