From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/kvm: Disable KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:17:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <931f6e6d-ac17-05f9-0605-ac8f89f40b2b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB5D96F-F322-45BB-9169-6BF932D413D4@amacapital.net>
On 09/04/20 17:03, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> No, I think we wouldn't use a paravirt #VE at this point, we would
>> use the real thing if available.
>>
>> It would still be possible to switch from the IST to the main
>> kernel stack before writing 0 to the reentrancy word.
>
> Almost but not quite. We do this for NMI-from-usermode, and it’s
> ugly. But we can’t do this for NMI-from-kernel or #VE-from-kernel
> because there might not be a kernel stack. Trying to hack around
> this won’t be pretty.
>
> Frankly, I think that we shouldn’t even try to report memory failure
> to the guest if it happens with interrupts off. Just kill the guest
> cleanly and keep it simple. Or inject an intentionally unrecoverable
> IST exception.
But it would be nice to use #VE for all host-side page faults, not just
for memory failure.
So the solution would be the same as for NMIs, duplicating the stack
frame and patching the outer handler's stack from the recursive #VE
(https://lwn.net/Articles/484932/). It's ugly but it's a known ugliness.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-09 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-07 2:26 [PATCH v2] x86/kvm: Disable KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-07 15:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-07 15:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-07 15:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-07 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-07 19:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-08 7:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 6:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-09 9:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 18:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-09 19:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 19:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-06 20:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 20:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-06 20:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-07 17:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-07 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-07 20:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-07 21:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-07 22:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 22:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-08 0:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-21 15:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-07 22:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 4:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-08 9:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-08 10:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 18:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-07 22:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-08 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-07 22:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 23:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 8:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-08 13:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-08 16:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-09 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-08 15:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-08 16:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-08 18:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 20:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-08 23:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 23:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-09 4:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-09 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 11:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-04-09 12:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 14:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-04-09 14:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 15:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-09 15:17 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-04-09 17:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-06 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=931f6e6d-ac17-05f9-0605-ac8f89f40b2b@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).