From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
hongwus@codeaurora.org, ziqichen@codeaurora.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] scsi: ufs: Rename flags pm_op_in_progress and is_sys_suspended
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:02:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <932ce816be805e4cca2c5beee8627918@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7c5d95e-8a69-dfef-44ea-bfcadd6ea5d5@acm.org>
Hi Bart,
On 2021-06-24 04:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/23/21 1:05 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 6/23/21 12:35 AM, Can Guo wrote:
>>> Rename pm_op_in_progress and is_sys_suspended to
>>> wlu_pm_op_in_progress and
>>> is_wlu_sys_suspended accordingly.
>>
>> My understanding is that power management operations must be submitted
>> to one particular UFS WLUN (hba->sdev_ufs_device). That makes the
>> "wlu_"
>> part of the new names redundant. In other words, I like the current
>> names better than the new names. Unless if I missed something,
>> consider
>> dropping this patch.
>
> Hi Can,
>
> Reviewing later patches in this series made me realize that there are
> two families of suspend/resume functions. One family of functions
> operates at the platform level while the other family operates at the
> SCSI LUN level. My comments about the suspend/resume functions are as
> follows:
> - It seems redundant to me to have system suspend support at the SCSI
> LUN level (__ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SYSTEM_PM)) and also at the
> platform level. Since the platform device is a parent of the SCSI
> WLUN, can system suspend/resume support be left out from
> ufshcd_wl_pm_ops (or in other words, remove the .freeze and .thaw
> callbacks)? Do we really need two calls from the power management
> subsystem into the UFS driver for every system suspend and every
> system resume?
Asutosh and Adrian should be the right persons to answer this, since
they've been working together on that huge change for 4 months -
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1417696/
In short, we need a dedicated suspend/resume ops for the UFS device
W-LU because one cannot send requests (not even PM requests) after the
device is runtime suspended - sending SSU cmds in hba suspend/resume
cannot pass through blk_queue_enter() as SSU cmd is sent to the UFS
device W-LU scsi device (by now it is runtime suspended) but not the
hba device.
Of course we can keep the old way and send the SSU cmd through a
request queue without block layer PM initialized (hba->cmd_queue for
example, by pointing cmd_queue->dev to the UFS device W-LU scsi device),
but that would look like a hack.
> - Because of the device links (device_link_add()), the ufschd_wl_*()
> RPM callbacks are invoked after all LUNs have been suspended. I would
> appreciate it if the "ufshcd_wl_" prefix would be changed into
> "ufshcd_lun_" since that would make it more clear that these
> callbacks
> are associated with all LUNs and not only with the WLUN through which
> power management commands are submitted.
>
Sure, we will do that later.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1624433711-9339-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] scsi: ufs: Rename flags pm_op_in_progress and is_sys_suspended Can Guo
2021-06-23 20:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 20:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 2:02 ` Can Guo [this message]
2021-06-24 2:34 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 6:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-23 20:42 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-06-23 22:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 2:04 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 17:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 23:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 7:01 ` Can Guo
2021-06-28 7:35 ` Can Guo
2021-06-28 17:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] scsi: ufs: Add " Can Guo
2021-06-23 12:33 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-24 2:05 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 20:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 2:07 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 17:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 7:11 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] scsi: ufs: Update the return value of supplier pm ops Can Guo
2021-06-23 21:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 2:11 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] scsi: ufs: Enable IRQ after enabling clocks in error handling preparation Can Guo
2021-06-23 21:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] scsi: ufs: Complete the cmd before returning in queuecommand Can Guo
2021-06-23 7:39 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] scsi: ufs: Remove a redundant tag check in ufshcd_queuecommand() Can Guo
2021-06-23 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] scsi: ufs: Remove host_sem used in suspend/resume Can Guo
2021-06-23 14:30 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-24 2:16 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 5:52 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-24 6:12 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 6:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-24 6:31 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 10:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-28 7:26 ` Can Guo
2021-07-07 19:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-24 17:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 8:17 ` Can Guo
2021-06-28 17:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-29 6:23 ` Can Guo
2021-06-29 18:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-29 21:50 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] scsi: ufs: Simplify error handling preparation Can Guo
2021-06-23 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] scsi: ufs: Update ufshcd_recover_pm_error() Can Guo
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] scsi: ufs: Update the fast abort path in ufshcd_abort() for PM requests Can Guo
2021-06-23 21:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 4:16 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 16:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] scsi: ufs: Apply more limitations to user access Can Guo
2021-06-23 21:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-24 2:23 ` Can Guo
2021-06-24 22:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 7:16 ` Can Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=932ce816be805e4cca2c5beee8627918@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hongwus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=ziqichen@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).