linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>, <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	<david@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <liuyuntao10@huawei.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:53:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <932d2334-f29e-ff6a-71b6-1e9c973be0ee@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220416103526.3287348-1-liupeng256@huawei.com>


On 2022/4/16 18:35, Peng Liu wrote:
> Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In
> this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node.
> Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.
>
> However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck
> all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
> Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
> Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
> Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
> ---
> v3->v4:
>   Make sure nid is valid before use node_online, and __alloc_bootmem_huge_page
>   is no need to check node_online, which is suggested by Kefeng.
  Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

>   mm/hugetlb.c | 12 +++++-------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index b34f50156f7e..a386c5f94932 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2979,8 +2979,6 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
>   	struct huge_bootmem_page *m = NULL; /* initialize for clang */
>   	int nr_nodes, node;
>   
> -	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid >= nr_online_nodes)
> -		return 0;
>   	/* do node specific alloc */
>   	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
>   		m = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
> @@ -3088,7 +3086,7 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages(struct hstate *h)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* do node specific alloc */
> -	for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++) {
> +	for_each_online_node(i) {
>   		if (h->max_huge_pages_node[i] > 0) {
>   			hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(h, i);
>   			node_specific_alloc = true;
> @@ -4049,7 +4047,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
>   			default_hstate.max_huge_pages =
>   				default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
>   
> -			for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
> +			for_each_online_node(i)
>   				default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
>   					default_hugepages_in_node[i];
>   		}
> @@ -4164,9 +4162,9 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
>   				pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
>   				return 0;
>   			}
> -			if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
> +			if (tmp >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(tmp))
>   				goto invalid;
> -			node = array_index_nospec(tmp, nr_online_nodes);
> +			node = array_index_nospec(tmp, MAX_NUMNODES);
>   			p += count + 1;
>   			/* Parse hugepages */
>   			if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
> @@ -4294,7 +4292,7 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
>   	 */
>   	if (default_hstate_max_huge_pages) {
>   		default_hstate.max_huge_pages = default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
> -		for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
> +		for_each_online_node(i)
>   			default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
>   				default_hugepages_in_node[i];
>   		if (hstate_is_gigantic(&default_hstate))

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-18  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-13  3:29 [PATCH v3 0/4] hugetlb: Fix some incorrect behavior Peng Liu
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes Peng Liu
2022-04-13  4:42   ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]     ` <692ee24c-a705-0c54-7cad-a9ecf49a8f15@huawei.com>
2022-04-13 22:04       ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-13  6:29   ` Baolin Wang
2022-04-14 23:36   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-15  2:09   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-04-15  5:41     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-16  1:21       ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-19  4:40         ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-19  8:54           ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-16 10:35   ` [PATCH v4] " Peng Liu
2022-04-18  5:53     ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2022-04-19  4:03     ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-19 14:07       ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-20  6:17         ` liupeng (DM)
2022-04-29  9:32     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] hugetlb: Fix hugepages_setup when deal with pernode Peng Liu
2022-04-14 23:50   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-29  9:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] hugetlb: Fix return value of __setup handlers Peng Liu
2022-04-13  6:39   ` Baolin Wang
2022-04-13  7:55   ` Muchun Song
     [not found]     ` <5bbf45e7-1d92-f543-5cfc-bc0141999d46@huawei.com>
2022-04-13  8:21       ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  8:45         ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-13  9:01           ` Muchun Song
2022-04-15  0:01   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-15  2:24   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-04-29  3:02   ` [PATCH v4] mm: Using for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open coding Peng Liu
2022-04-29  9:29     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-29 11:44     ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  3:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] hugetlb: Clean up hugetlb_cma_reserve Peng Liu
2022-04-13  5:50   ` Muchun Song
2022-04-13  6:41   ` Baolin Wang
2022-04-15  0:03   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-04-15  2:15   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-04-29  9:28   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=932d2334-f29e-ff6a-71b6-1e9c973be0ee@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liupeng256@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyuntao10@huawei.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yaozhenguo1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).