From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] x86/tlb: Privatize cpu_tlbstate
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 11:48:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <933D5C14-5948-48FC-9379-167F59BD1FA1@amacapital.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531063645.4697-9-namit@vmware.com>
> On May 30, 2019, at 11:36 PM, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> wrote:
>
> cpu_tlbstate is mostly private and only the variable is_lazy is shared.
> This causes some false-sharing when TLB flushes are performed.
>
> Break cpu_tlbstate intro cpu_tlbstate and cpu_tlbstate_shared, and mark
> each one accordingly.
>
At some point we’ll want to do a better job with our PV flush code, and I suspect we’ll end up with more of this shared again.
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 15 ++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 79272938cf79..a1fea36d5292 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -178,23 +178,6 @@ struct tlb_state {
> u16 loaded_mm_asid;
> u16 next_asid;
>
> - /*
> - * We can be in one of several states:
> - *
> - * - Actively using an mm. Our CPU's bit will be set in
> - * mm_cpumask(loaded_mm) and is_lazy == false;
> - *
> - * - Not using a real mm. loaded_mm == &init_mm. Our CPU's bit
> - * will not be set in mm_cpumask(&init_mm) and is_lazy == false.
> - *
> - * - Lazily using a real mm. loaded_mm != &init_mm, our bit
> - * is set in mm_cpumask(loaded_mm), but is_lazy == true.
> - * We're heuristically guessing that the CR3 load we
> - * skipped more than makes up for the overhead added by
> - * lazy mode.
> - */
> - bool is_lazy;
> -
> /*
> * If set we changed the page tables in such a way that we
> * needed an invalidation of all contexts (aka. PCIDs / ASIDs).
> @@ -240,7 +223,27 @@ struct tlb_state {
> */
> struct tlb_context ctxs[TLB_NR_DYN_ASIDS];
> };
> -DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate);
> +
> +struct tlb_state_shared {
> + /*
> + * We can be in one of several states:
> + *
> + * - Actively using an mm. Our CPU's bit will be set in
> + * mm_cpumask(loaded_mm) and is_lazy == false;
> + *
> + * - Not using a real mm. loaded_mm == &init_mm. Our CPU's bit
> + * will not be set in mm_cpumask(&init_mm) and is_lazy == false.
> + *
> + * - Lazily using a real mm. loaded_mm != &init_mm, our bit
> + * is set in mm_cpumask(loaded_mm), but is_lazy == true.
> + * We're heuristically guessing that the CR3 load we
> + * skipped more than makes up for the overhead added by
> + * lazy mode.
> + */
> + bool is_lazy;
> +};
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state_shared, cpu_tlbstate_shared);
>
> /*
> * Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous
> @@ -439,6 +442,7 @@ static inline void __native_flush_tlb_one_user(unsigned long addr)
> {
> u32 loaded_mm_asid = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid);
>
> + //invpcid_flush_one(kern_pcid(loaded_mm_asid), addr);
> asm volatile("invlpg (%0)" ::"r" (addr) : "memory");
>
> if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index fd10d91a6115..34027f36a944 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ void __init zone_sizes_init(void)
> free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
> }
>
> -__visible DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate) = {
> +__visible DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate) = {
> .loaded_mm = &init_mm,
> .next_asid = 1,
> .cr4 = ~0UL, /* fail hard if we screw up cr4 shadow initialization */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index b0c3065aad5d..755b2bb3e5b6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void leave_mm(int cpu)
> return;
>
> /* Warn if we're not lazy. */
> - WARN_ON(!this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy));
> + WARN_ON(!this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy));
>
> switch_mm(NULL, &init_mm, NULL);
> }
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> {
> struct mm_struct *real_prev = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
> u16 prev_asid = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid);
> - bool was_lazy = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy);
> + bool was_lazy = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy);
> unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
> u64 next_tlb_gen;
> bool need_flush;
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> __flush_tlb_all();
> }
> #endif
> - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, false);
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, false);
>
> /*
> * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier and
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
> if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
> return;
>
> - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, true);
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_func_common(const struct flush_tlb_info *f,
> VM_WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[loaded_mm_asid].ctx_id) !=
> loaded_mm->context.ctx_id);
>
> - if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy)) {
> + if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy)) {
> /*
> * We're in lazy mode. We need to at least flush our
> * paging-structure cache to avoid speculatively reading
> @@ -659,11 +659,14 @@ static void flush_tlb_func_remote(void *info)
>
> static inline bool tlb_is_not_lazy(int cpu)
> {
> - return !per_cpu(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, cpu);
> + return !per_cpu(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, cpu);
> }
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_t, flush_tlb_mask);
>
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state_shared, cpu_tlbstate_shared);
> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_tlbstate_shared);
> +
> void native_flush_tlb_multi(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
> {
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 6:36 [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] x86: Flush remote TLBs concurrently and async Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/12] smp: Remove smp_call_function() and on_each_cpu() return values Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/12] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many() Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/12] x86/mm/tlb: Refactor common code into flush_tlb_on_cpus() Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/12] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 11:48 ` Juergen Gross
2019-05-31 19:44 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/12] x86/mm/tlb: Optimize local TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: x86: Provide paravirtualized flush_tlb_multi() Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/12] smp: Do not mark call_function_data as shared Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 17:50 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] x86/tlb: Privatize cpu_tlbstate Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 18:48 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2019-05-31 19:42 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/12] x86/apic: Use non-atomic operations when possible Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/12] smp: Enable data inlining for inter-processor function call Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/12] x86/mm/tlb: Use async and inline messages for flushing Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 18:29 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 19:20 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-31 20:04 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 20:37 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-31 18:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 19:31 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 20:13 ` Dave Hansen
2019-05-31 20:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 20:42 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 21:06 ` Dave Hansen
2019-05-31 21:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 21:33 ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-31 21:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 22:07 ` Nadav Amit
2019-06-07 5:28 ` Nadav Amit
2019-06-07 16:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/12] x86/mm/tlb: Reverting the removal of flush_tlb_info from stack Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=933D5C14-5948-48FC-9379-167F59BD1FA1@amacapital.net \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).