From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>,
<damien.lemoal@wdc.com>, <bvanassche@acm.org>,
<dhowells@redhat.com>, <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
<ajay.joshi@wdc.com>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
<zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>, <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: revert pushing the final release of request_queue to a workqueue.
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 14:12:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93d1c4fd-847f-fbec-7013-708f166722f8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207130446.GA14465@ming.t460p>
On 2020/2/7 21:04, Ming Lei wrote:
> But blk_mq_debugfs_register() in your step 3 for adding loop still may
> fail, that is why I suggest to consider to move
> blk_mq_debugfs_register() into blk_unregister_queue().
I think therer might be a problem.
static void loop_remove(struct loop_device *lo)
{
del_gendisk(lo->lo_disk);
blk_cleanup_queue(lo->lo_queue);
blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
put_disk(lo->lo_disk);
kfree(lo);
}
blk_unregister_queue() is called in del_gendisk(), while
blk_cleanup_queue() remove other files or dirs. And
blk_mq_debugfs_register() should be called at last since it
will remove everything.
Thanks
Yu Kuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-08 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 11:10 [PATCH] block: revert pushing the final release of request_queue to a workqueue yu kuai
2020-02-07 4:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-07 6:02 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 7:10 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 9:30 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-07 10:26 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 12:24 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 13:04 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-08 6:12 ` yukuai (C) [this message]
2020-02-10 1:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-10 2:13 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-10 2:32 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-10 3:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-10 8:49 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93d1c4fd-847f-fbec-7013-708f166722f8@huawei.com \
--to=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=ajay.joshi@wdc.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoshijie1@huawei.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).