linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"Box, David E" <david.e.box@intel.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Rafaell J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:59:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FE969D3@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CC724702000078000E149B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

I have not seen a discussion of the details on this, so can someone explain to me just why acpi_os_prepare_sleep is needed, what does it do, and why these changes are being made to ACPICA code?

Thanks,
Bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:12 AM
> To: Ben Guthro
> Cc: Moore, Robert; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Rafaell
> J . Wysocki; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new
> extended parameter
> 
> >>> On 27.06.13 at 17:02, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Change the function definitions of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() and
> > acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep() to pass along the new extended sleep
> > parameter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rafaell J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/osl.c   |   16 ++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/acpi.h |    6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index
> > e721863..0251c9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_in_debugger);  extern char
> > line_buf[80];
> >  #endif				/*ENABLE_DEBUGGER */
> >
> > -static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_ctrl,
> > -				      u32 pm1b_ctrl);
> > +static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32
> val_b,
> > +				      bool extended);
> 
> So from here till patch 5 the build will be half broken because of the
> type mismatches? I think at least the types of the consumers need to be
> changed in this patch; leaving the meat of the Xen change to patch 4 is
> perhaps fine.
> 
> Jan
> 
> >
> >  static acpi_osd_handler acpi_irq_handler;  static void
> > *acpi_irq_context; @@ -1757,13 +1757,13 @@ acpi_status
> > acpi_os_terminate(void)
> >  	return AE_OK;
> >  }
> >
> > -acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> > -				  u32 pm1b_control)
> > +acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b,
> > +				  u8 extended)
> >  {
> >  	int rc = 0;
> >  	if (__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)
> > -		rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state,
> > -					     pm1a_control, pm1b_control);
> > +		rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state, val_a, val_b,
> > +					     extended);
> >  	if (rc < 0)
> >  		return AE_ERROR;
> >  	else if (rc > 0)
> > @@ -1772,8 +1772,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8
> > sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> >  	return AE_OK;
> >  }
> >
> > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> > -			       u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl))
> > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> > +			       u32 val_b, bool extended))
> >  {
> >  	__acpi_os_prepare_sleep = func;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index
> > 709a2f2..26f9996 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct
> > device *dev,
> >  #endif	/* !CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> > -			       u32 pm1a_ctrl,  u32 pm1b_ctrl));
> > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> > +			       u32 val_b, bool extended));
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> >  void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size);
> > #else @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static inline void
> > arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr,  }  #endif /*
> > CONFIG_X86 */  #else -#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func,
> > pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while
> > (0)
> > +#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, val_a, val_b, ext) do { }
> > +while (0)
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-27 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-27 15:01 [PATCH v4 0/5] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] acpi: Remove need to include linux/acpi.h in common acpica code Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in reduced hardware sleep path Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:11   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 15:59     ` Moore, Robert [this message]
2013-06-27 16:12       ` Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 20:19         ` Moore, Robert
2013-06-27 20:35           ` Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] xen/acpi: notify xen when reduced hardware sleep is available Ben Guthro
2013-07-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-27 15:33   ` Ben Guthro
2013-07-27 23:31     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FE969D3@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=benjamin.guthro@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).