From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
"Box, David E" <david.e.box@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Rafaell J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:59:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FE969D3@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CC724702000078000E149B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
I have not seen a discussion of the details on this, so can someone explain to me just why acpi_os_prepare_sleep is needed, what does it do, and why these changes are being made to ACPICA code?
Thanks,
Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:12 AM
> To: Ben Guthro
> Cc: Moore, Robert; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Rafaell
> J . Wysocki; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new
> extended parameter
>
> >>> On 27.06.13 at 17:02, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Change the function definitions of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() and
> > acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep() to pass along the new extended sleep
> > parameter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rafaell J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index
> > e721863..0251c9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_in_debugger); extern char
> > line_buf[80];
> > #endif /*ENABLE_DEBUGGER */
> >
> > -static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_ctrl,
> > - u32 pm1b_ctrl);
> > +static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32
> val_b,
> > + bool extended);
>
> So from here till patch 5 the build will be half broken because of the
> type mismatches? I think at least the types of the consumers need to be
> changed in this patch; leaving the meat of the Xen change to patch 4 is
> perhaps fine.
>
> Jan
>
> >
> > static acpi_osd_handler acpi_irq_handler; static void
> > *acpi_irq_context; @@ -1757,13 +1757,13 @@ acpi_status
> > acpi_os_terminate(void)
> > return AE_OK;
> > }
> >
> > -acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> > - u32 pm1b_control)
> > +acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b,
> > + u8 extended)
> > {
> > int rc = 0;
> > if (__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)
> > - rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state,
> > - pm1a_control, pm1b_control);
> > + rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state, val_a, val_b,
> > + extended);
> > if (rc < 0)
> > return AE_ERROR;
> > else if (rc > 0)
> > @@ -1772,8 +1772,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8
> > sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> > return AE_OK;
> > }
> >
> > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> > - u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl))
> > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> > + u32 val_b, bool extended))
> > {
> > __acpi_os_prepare_sleep = func;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index
> > 709a2f2..26f9996 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct
> > device *dev,
> > #endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> > - u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl));
> > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> > + u32 val_b, bool extended));
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size);
> > #else @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static inline void
> > arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, } #endif /*
> > CONFIG_X86 */ #else -#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func,
> > pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while
> > (0)
> > +#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, val_a, val_b, ext) do { }
> > +while (0)
> > #endif
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 15:01 [PATCH v4 0/5] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] acpi: Remove need to include linux/acpi.h in common acpica code Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in reduced hardware sleep path Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 15:59 ` Moore, Robert [this message]
2013-06-27 16:12 ` Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 20:19 ` Moore, Robert
2013-06-27 20:35 ` Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep Ben Guthro
2013-06-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] xen/acpi: notify xen when reduced hardware sleep is available Ben Guthro
2013-07-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-27 15:33 ` Ben Guthro
2013-07-27 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FE969D3@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=benjamin.guthro@citrix.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).