linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] acpi/processor: fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:21:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <952fdc14-a8e5-a59a-9c7d-af1adf361d77@oderland.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121102113.41893-2-roger.pau@citrix.com>

On 11/21/22 11:21, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> When running as a Xen dom0 the number of CPUs available to Linux can
> be different from the number of CPUs present on the system, but in
> order to properly fetch processor performance related data _PDC must
> be executed on all the physical CPUs online on the system.
>
> The current checks in processor_physically_present() result in some
> processor objects not getting their _PDC methods evaluated when Linux
> is running as Xen dom0.  Fix this by introducing a custom function to
> use when running as Xen dom0 in order to check whether a processor
> object matches a CPU that's online.
>
> Fixes: 5d554a7bb064 ('ACPI: processor: add internal processor_physically_present()')
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 10 ++++++++++
>   arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c              | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c          | 11 +++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> index 16f548a661cf..b9f512138043 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> @@ -61,4 +61,14 @@ void __init xen_pvh_init(struct boot_params *boot_params);
>   void __init mem_map_via_hcall(struct boot_params *boot_params_p);
>   #endif
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0
> +bool __init xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id);
> +#else
> +static inline bool xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id)
> +{
> +	BUG();
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   #endif /* _ASM_X86_XEN_HYPERVISOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index b8db2148c07d..d4c44361a26c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -346,3 +346,30 @@ void xen_arch_unregister_cpu(int num)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_arch_unregister_cpu);
>   #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0
> +bool __init xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i, maxid;
> +	struct xen_platform_op op = {
> +		.cmd = XENPF_get_cpuinfo,
> +		.interface_version = XENPF_INTERFACE_VERSION,
> +	};
> +	int ret = HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	maxid = op.u.pcpu_info.max_present;
> +	for (i = 0; i <= maxid; i++) {
> +		op.u.pcpu_info.xen_cpuid = i;
> +		ret = HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> +		if (ret)
> +			continue;
> +		if (op.u.pcpu_info.acpi_id == acpi_id)
> +			return op.u.pcpu_info.flags & XEN_PCPU_FLAGS_ONLINE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
My compiler (Default GCC on Fedora 32, compiling for Qubes) complain 
loudly that the below was missing.

+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_processor_present);

`ERROR: MODPOST xen_processor_present 
[drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.ko] undefined!`

Same thing with xen_sanitize_pdc in the next patch.

+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_sanitize_pdc);

Everything compiled fine after those changes.
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> index 8c3f82c9fff3..18fb04523f93 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>   #include <acpi/processor.h>
>   
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
> +
>   #include "internal.h"
>   
>   static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
> @@ -47,6 +49,15 @@ static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
>   		return false;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (xen_initial_domain())
> +		/*
> +		 * When running as a Xen dom0 the number of processors Linux
> +		 * sees can be different from the real number of processors on
> +		 * the system, and we still need to execute _PDC for all of
> +		 * them.
> +		 */
> +		return xen_processor_present(acpi_id);
> +
>   	type = (acpi_type == ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) ? 1 : 0;
>   	cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(handle, type, acpi_id);
>   


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 10:21 [PATCH 0/3] xen: ACPI processor related fixes Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] acpi/processor: fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 14:02   ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 14:29     ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 14:51       ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 15:09         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-29 16:01   ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-29 17:43   ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-30 15:53     ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-30 16:48       ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 12:24         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-12-02 16:17           ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 16:37             ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-12-02 17:06               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-09 10:12                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-01-30  9:21   ` Josef Johansson [this message]
2023-02-03  7:05     ` Jan Beulich
2023-02-03 13:58       ` Josef Johansson
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] acpi/processor: sanitize _PDC buffer bits " Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 14:10   ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 14:13     ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 15:03     ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-06-14 19:57       ` Jason Andryuk
2023-06-16 14:39         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/acpi: upload power and performance related data from a PVH dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2023-01-30  9:10   ` Josef Johansson
2023-03-15 11:39     ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16  7:54       ` Josef Johansson
2023-03-16 10:06         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 14:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] xen: ACPI processor related fixes Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 16:27   ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=952fdc14-a8e5-a59a-9c7d-af1adf361d77@oderland.se \
    --to=josef@oderland.se \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).