From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267049AbTAPLmK>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:42:10 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267050AbTAPLmJ>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:42:09 -0500
Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:41966 "EHLO
	passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267049AbTAPLmI>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:42:08 -0500
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 13/07/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
X-Accept-Language: en_GB
In-Reply-To: <8dqiqC6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> 
References: <8dqiqC6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de>  <20030113134017$1d68@gated-at.bofh.it> 
To: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rpjday@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:47:48 +0000
Message-ID: <9583.1042717668@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


kaih@khms.westfalen.de said:
> >   this is inconsistent with other common things people are
> > familiar with -- in the pine mailer, for example, you can't
> > use a folder both for storing files *and* for having subfolders.
> > and think about bookmarks in a browser (a model i wish the new
> > config process had followed).

> Strange. Filesystems (which everyone should be familiar with)
> certainly do   this, and so does (for example) Pegasus Mail with IMAP
> folders ...

> I think Pine and bookmarks are faulty here.

Nah. Pine can do folders containing both mail and subfolders just fine.


--
dwmw2