From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, bristot@redhat.com, prime.zeng@huawei.com,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
21cnbao@gmail.com, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,
guodong.xu@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in wake-up path
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:30:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95f82bf3524289bfbcaeee6e83b6dac48ed07f25.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b793e565-670d-cc66-6947-7d927ebcb8b3@huawei.com>
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 10:02 +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> On 2022/1/27 9:14, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 16:09 +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> > > From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> > >
> > > For platforms having clusters like Kunpeng920, CPUs within the
> > > same
> > > cluster have lower latency when synchronizing and accessing
> > > shared
> > > resources like cache. Thus, this patch tries to find an idle cpu
> > > within the cluster of the target CPU before scanning the whole
> > > LLC
> > > to gain lower latency.
> > >
> > > Note neither Kunpeng920 nor x86 Jacobsville supports SMT, so this
> > > patch doesn't consider SMT for this moment.
> > >
> > > Testing has been done on Kunpeng920 by pinning tasks to one numa
> > > and two numa. On Kunpeng920, Each numa has 8 clusters and each
> > > cluster has 4 CPUs.
> > >
> > > With this patch, We noticed enhancement on tbench within one
> > > numa or cross two numa.
> > >
> > > On numa 0:
> > > 5.17-rc1 patched
> > > Hmean 1 324.73 ( 0.00%) 378.01 * 16.41%*
> > > Hmean 2 645.36 ( 0.00%) 754.63 * 16.93%*
> > > Hmean 4 1302.09 ( 0.00%) 1507.54 * 15.78%*
> > > Hmean 8 2612.03 ( 0.00%) 2982.57 * 14.19%*
> > > Hmean 16 5307.12 ( 0.00%) 5886.66 * 10.92%*
> > > Hmean 32 9354.22 ( 0.00%) 9908.13 * 5.92%*
> > > Hmean 64 7240.35 ( 0.00%) 7278.78 * 0.53%*
> > > Hmean 128 6186.40 ( 0.00%) 6187.85 ( 0.02%)
> > >
> > > On numa 0-1:
> > > 5.17-rc1 patched
> > > Hmean 1 320.01 ( 0.00%) 378.44 * 18.26%*
> > > Hmean 2 643.85 ( 0.00%) 752.52 * 16.88%*
> > > Hmean 4 1287.36 ( 0.00%) 1505.62 * 16.95%*
> > > Hmean 8 2564.60 ( 0.00%) 2955.29 * 15.23%*
> > > Hmean 16 5195.69 ( 0.00%) 5814.74 * 11.91%*
> > > Hmean 32 9769.16 ( 0.00%) 10872.63 * 11.30%*
> > > Hmean 64 15952.50 ( 0.00%) 17281.98 * 8.33%*
> > > Hmean 128 13113.77 ( 0.00%) 13895.20 * 5.96%*
> > > Hmean 256 10997.59 ( 0.00%) 11244.69 * 2.25%*
> > > Hmean 512 14623.60 ( 0.00%) 15526.25 * 6.17%*
> > >
> > > This will also help to improve the MySQL. With MySQL server
> > > running on numa 0 and client running on numa 1, both QPS and
> > > latency is imporved on read-write case:
> > > 5.17-rc1 patched
> > > QPS-16threads 143333.2633 145077.4033(+1.22%)
> > > QPS-24threads 195085.9367 202719.6133(+3.91%)
> > > QPS-32threads 241165.6867 249020.74(+3.26%)
> > > QPS-64threads 244586.8433 253387.7567(+3.60%)
> > > avg-lat-16threads 2.23 2.19(+1.19%)
> > > avg-lat-24threads 2.46 2.36(+3.79%)
> > > avg-lat-36threads 2.66 2.57(+3.26%)
> > > avg-lat-64threads 5.23 5.05(+3.44%)
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 46
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > ----
> > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > index 5146163bfabb..2f84a933aedd 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > @@ -6262,12 +6262,46 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct
> > > task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd
> > >
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
> > > +/*
> > > + * Scan the cluster domain for idle CPUs and clear cluster
> > > cpumask
> > > after scanning
> > > + */
> > > +static inline int scan_cluster(struct task_struct *p, int
> > > prev_cpu,
> > > int target)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cpumask *cpus =
> > > this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
> > > + struct sched_domain *sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_cluster,
> > > target));
> > > + int cpu, idle_cpu;
> > > +
> > > + /* TODO: Support SMT case while a machine with both cluster and
> > > SMT born */
> >
> > This is probably a clearer comment
> >
> > /* TODO: Support SMT system with cluster topology */
> >
> > > + if (!sched_smt_active() && sd) {
> > > + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpus, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
> > > + idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu, p);
> > > */
> > > -static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct
> > > sched_domain *sd, bool has_idle_core, int target)
> > > +static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct
> > > sched_domain *sd, bool has_idle_core, int prev_cpu, int target)
> > > {
> > > struct cpumask *cpus =
> > > this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
> > > int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
> > > @@ -6282,6 +6316,10 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct
> > > task_struct
> > > *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
> > >
> > > cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
> > >
> > > + idle_cpu = scan_cluster(p, prev_cpu, target);
> >
> > Shouldn't "cpus" from
> >
> > cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
> >
> > be passed to scan_cluster, to make sure that the cpu returned is
> > in the affinity mask of the task? I don't see p->cpus_ptr
> > being checked in scan_cluster to make sure the cpu found is in the
> > affinity mask.
> >
>
> The cpus scanned in scan_cluster() is the intersection of
> select_idle_mask and sched_domain_span(cluster_sd), and
> we limited the select_idle_mask in the tasks' affinity mask
> before we enter scan_cluster() here.
Ah, I missed the fact that cpus point to the select_idle_mask.
Thanks.
Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-26 8:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair: Wake task within the cluster when possible Yicong Yang
2022-01-26 8:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add per_cpu cluster domain info and cpus_share_resources API Yicong Yang
2022-01-27 15:26 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-01-26 8:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in wake-up path Yicong Yang
2022-01-27 1:14 ` Tim Chen
2022-01-27 2:02 ` Yicong Yang
2022-01-27 2:30 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2022-01-27 2:36 ` Tim Chen
2022-01-27 3:05 ` Yicong Yang
2022-01-27 15:41 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-01-27 20:21 ` Barry Song
2022-01-28 7:13 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2022-01-27 18:40 ` Barry Song
2022-02-01 9:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2022-02-01 20:20 ` Barry Song
2022-02-04 7:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2022-02-04 10:28 ` Barry Song
2022-02-04 10:49 ` Barry Song
2022-02-04 17:41 ` Tim Chen
2022-02-05 17:16 ` Chen Yu
2022-02-06 0:26 ` Barry Song
2022-02-07 15:14 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-02-08 5:42 ` Barry Song
2022-02-16 9:12 ` Barry Song
2022-02-16 9:19 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2022-02-16 10:00 ` Yicong Yang
2022-02-17 18:00 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95f82bf3524289bfbcaeee6e83b6dac48ed07f25.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@huawei.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).