From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CA7C33C9E for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13409206D7 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Rl4+8Usj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729833AbgAQD6S (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:58:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:40201 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726706AbgAQD6O (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:58:14 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id s21so9288397plr.7; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:58:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=shqXRsJsdu/xy1Xl+XnJg4wnSngJgxD5PsfBp0ubXcY=; b=Rl4+8UsjEd48fdTqJC6jxbv9kZ9+2+uNUKrmvAZeUJylkmOjjLCzm+epgcQRrcbl7i SB1SSof0XbxlvsWvif2elBjfu1R8s8nWd+eYso3x6nOFy2AM2KGQ2zu26iWj5Jj0NyX+ BZ39gdxuoq55b4KjCHSNlkpXboVYH7MrFVra47bYJr4FiQh19I5Ce4ywVv0AdplOSA86 dZkE1yta68GK1xZq4GdxlQZ7Rz61USlzESc5WDecZV481Dtbwp5O1s8z4PJBksHjuJXW LaiwQeza8eKCjX4HyhCJbkcnwnCVp20dEhs7tp1pkSCoSGNfR/JFPM0Cz4GihTOWsMmE TUiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=shqXRsJsdu/xy1Xl+XnJg4wnSngJgxD5PsfBp0ubXcY=; b=ZH1Ch1bJ3pTwRkwsXfgPf+/fKA7jsMLG3X6TXDcPUCftA4SUyS5IksbQ0p1N0jHzts UZqnHkeQtaHZYAYcpzwFyaTU1CgYDGw99H+8xx9wMAYo+H7dcfT9bObCwxvAq/A61aco z7n8saFpj0iNhFeNmdQmgWSn3z84CTr8d3wAgNzYyA0VJEz/g1tjEwkPdGpDi7gWXXhy gCOde6Dl+pHItdfAqIc52xNYvByKWNt/Vu7z9HxY9KstpPV284Z4PqfQHQ6e4k5fGZ5b RnQRTBpbEHYZWN+eASztHdba9g860is+xUJwv3k2kc2Z5cp5bx5jcHJtu7YiVgwVjLbU QdcA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRLqQhOGDWXgLOydPPJwfOtllTS3+4wa/VADUd/VykuflFwAL/ bwhdSrNFBMhKPyO1JmD1YirojFzI X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIG6Spk7Lyhx6RcHaU51tRx2ZiyXzs62UNhINGV1ayewUm94jKh83MHfiuiFRpwYl2U4yUGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b008:: with SMTP id x8mr3369587pjq.106.1579233493922; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:58:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm26983737pfn.42.2020.01.16.19.58.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:58:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/4] hwmon: k10temp driver improvements To: Ken Moffat Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Clemens Ladisch , Jean Delvare , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200116141800.9828-1-linux@roeck-us.net> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <964a5977-8d67-b0fd-4df4-c6bd41a8ad58@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:58:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ken, On 1/16/20 4:38 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:18, Guenter Roeck wrote: [ ... ] > I have some Zen1 and Zen1+ here. > > My Ryzen 3 1300X, applied to 5.5.0-rc5 > > machine idle, I thought at first the temperature may be a bit low, so > I've added other reported temperatures. I now think it is maybe ok. > > k10temp-pci-00c3 > Adapter: PCI adapter > Vcore: +1.41 V > Vsoc: +0.89 V > Tdie: +21.2°C (high = +70.0°C) > Tctl: +21.2°C > Icore: +30.14 A > Isoc: +8.66 A > > SYSTIN: +29.0°C (high = +0.0°C, hyst = +0.0°C) > ALARM sensor = thermistor > CPUTIN: +25.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) > sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN0: -1.5°C sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN1: +87.0°C sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN2: +23.0°C sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN3: -27.0°C sensor = thermistor > SMBUSMASTER 0: +20.5°C > SMBUSMASTER 0 is the CPU, so we have a match with the temperatures. > After about 2 minutes of make -j8 on kernel, to load it > > k10temp-pci-00c3 > Adapter: PCI adapter > Vcore: +1.26 V > Vsoc: +0.89 V > Tdie: +46.2°C (high = +70.0°C) > Tctl: +46.2°C > Icore: +45.73 A > Isoc: +11.18 A > Both Vcore and Icore should be much less when idle, and higher under load. The data from the Super-IO chip suggests that it is a Nuvoton chip. Can you report its first voltage (in0) ? That should roughly match Vcore. > SYSTIN: +29.0°C (high = +0.0°C, hyst = +0.0°C) > ALARM sensor = thermistor > CPUTIN: +38.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) > sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN0: -7.5°C sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN1: +85.0°C sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN2: +23.0°C sensor = thermistor > AUXTIN3: -27.0°C sensor = thermistor > SMBUSMASTER 0: +46.0°C > > So I guess the temperatures *are* in the right area. > Interestingly, the Vcore restores to above +1.4V when idle. > It should be much lower when idle, actually, not higher. All other data looks ok. Thanks, Guenter