linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:52:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96b7c46d-8af1-4841-c97e-694abcf3b28b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57392d12-9a6c-dbb5-3c3e-39ed9ab7c31c@huawei.com>

On 07.09.21 03:46, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2021/9/6 20:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 06.09.21 14:45, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> On 2021/9/6 20:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 06.09.21 14:02, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> On 04.09.21 11:18, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>>> If __isolate_free_page() failed, due to zone watermark check, the page is
>>>>>> still on the free list. But this page will be put back to free list again
>>>>>> via __putback_isolated_page() now. This may trigger page->flags checks in
>>>>>> __free_one_page() if PageReported is set. Or we will corrupt the free list
>>>>>> because list_add() will be called for pages already on another list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>      mm/page_isolation.c | 6 ++----
>>>>>>      1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
>>>>>> index 9bb562d5d194..7d70d772525c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
>>>>>> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
>>>>>> @@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype)
>>>>>>                  buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order);
>>>>>>                  buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn);
>>>>>>      -            if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy)) {
>>>>>> -                __isolate_free_page(page, order);
>>>>>> -                isolated_page = true;
>>>>>> -            }
>>>>>> +            if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy))
>>>>>> +                isolated_page = !!__isolate_free_page(page, order);
>>>>>>              }
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To make the confusion perfect (sorry) :D I tripple-checked:
>>>>
>>>> In unset_migratetype_isolate() we check that is_migrate_isolate_page(page) holds, otherwise we return.
>>>>
>>>> We call __isolate_free_page() only for such pages.
>>>>
>>>> __isolate_free_page() won't perform watermark checks on is_migrate_isolate().
>>>>
>>>> Consequently, __isolate_free_page() should never fail when called from unset_migratetype_isolate()
>>>>
>>>> If that's correct then we  could instead maybe add a VM_BUG_ON() and a comment why this can't fail.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Makes sense or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> I think you're right. __isolate_free_page() should never fail when called from unset_migratetype_isolate()
>>> as explained by you. But it might be too fragile to reply on the failure conditions of __isolate_free_page().
>>> If that changes, VM_BUG_ON() here might trigger unexpectedly. Or am I just over-worried as failure conditions
>>> of __isolate_free_page() can hardly change?
>>
>> Maybe
>>
>> isolated_page = !!__isolate_free_page(page, order);
>> /*
>>   * Isolating a free page in an isolated pageblock is expected to always
>>   * work as watermarks don't apply here.
>>   */
>> VM_BUG_ON(isolated_page);
> 
> Should this be VM_BUG_ON(!isolated_page) ?
> 

Ehm, yes :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-07  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-04  9:18 [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page Miaohe Lin
2021-09-06  9:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-06 11:32   ` Miaohe Lin
2021-09-06 11:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-06 12:01       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-06 12:08         ` Miaohe Lin
2021-09-06 12:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-06 12:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-06 12:45     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-09-06 12:49       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-07  1:46         ` Miaohe Lin
2021-09-07  9:52           ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-09-07  8:08         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-07  9:56           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-08 22:42             ` John Hubbard
2021-09-09  8:56               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-09  9:07                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-09  9:37                   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-09 16:50                 ` John Hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96b7c46d-8af1-4841-c97e-694abcf3b28b@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).