From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965954AbdAIL3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:29:37 -0500 Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.31]:60561 "EHLO lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965889AbdAIL32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:29:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder To: Rick Chang References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479894203.8964.29.camel@mtksdaap41> <1483670099.18931.5.camel@mtksdaap41> Cc: Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Minghsiu Tsai From: Hans Verkuil Message-ID: <974d20f3-5133-0869-2a35-c1617bec5d6e@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:29:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1483670099.18931.5.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rick, On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: > Hi Hans, > > The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have > any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge > the source code and dt-binding first? Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason it hasn't been merged yet? If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is merged. Regards, Hans > > Best Regards, > Rick > > On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 17:43 +0800, Rick Chang wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:54 +0800, Rick Chang wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:43 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>> On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote: >>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>>>> On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote: >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chang >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> This patch depends on: >>>>>>> CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1] >>>>>>> iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html >>>>>>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in >>>>>> after the >>>>>> other two are merged in 4.10? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Hans >>>>> >>>>> [1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this >>>>> patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11. >>>> >>>> So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch >>>> until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Hans >>> >>> What do you think about this? You merge the driver first and I send this >>> patch again after [1] & [2] is merged. >> >> BTW, to prevent merging conflict, the dtsi should be merged by mediatek >> SoC maintainer, Matthias.I think we can only take care on the driver >> part at this moment. >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >