linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities
@ 2018-10-14 18:52 Ivan Chavero
  2018-10-15  1:46 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ivan Chavero @ 2018-10-14 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: corbet; +Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, gregkh, torvalds, Ivan Chavero

The language and focus of the CoC has some ambiguities that
could lead to conflicts that might distract maintainers and
contributors attention from the technical nature of the
Linux kernel.
This patch aims to clarify this problems and focus the document
to a more possitive, healthy and technical standpoint.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Chavero <ichavero@chavero.com.mx>
---
 Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 33 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
index ab7c24b5478c..78d7dbe3fee3 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
@@ -6,10 +6,12 @@ Our Pledge
 
 In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
 contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and
-our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
-size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and
-expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality,
-personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
+our community an effective and enriching experience to any sentient being
+in the Universe.
+Technical excellence should be the main focus of the community and any topics
+and discussions outside of the technical scope should not be relevant to the
+goals of the project.
+
 
 Our Standards
 =============
@@ -17,23 +19,22 @@ Our Standards
 Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
 include:
 
-* Using welcoming and inclusive language
-* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
-* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
-* Focusing on what is best for the community
-* Showing empathy towards other community members
+* Using welcoming and inclusive language.
+* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences.
+* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism.
+* Focusing on what is best for the community.
+* Showing empathy towards other community members.
+* Use facts instead of opinions.
 
 
 Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
 
-* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
-  advances
-* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
-* Public or private harassment
+* Public or private harassment.
 * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
-  address, without explicit permission
-* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
-  professional setting
+  address, without explicit permission.
+* Discussion of topics that are not relevant to the focus of the project.
+* The use of gender, racial or any other non technical argument in order
+  to win a technical debate.
 
 
 Our Responsibilities
-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities
  2018-10-14 18:52 [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities Ivan Chavero
@ 2018-10-15  1:46 ` Joe Perches
  2018-10-16 12:21   ` Iván Chavero
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2018-10-15  1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ivan Chavero, corbet; +Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, gregkh, torvalds

On Sun, 2018-10-14 at 13:52 -0500, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> The language and focus of the CoC has some ambiguities that
> could lead to conflicts that might distract maintainers and
> contributors attention from the technical nature of the
> Linux kernel.
> This patch aims to clarify this problems and focus the document
> to a more possitive, healthy and technical standpoint.
[]
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
[]
> @@ -17,23 +19,22 @@ Our Standards
>  Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
>  include:
>  
> -* Using welcoming and inclusive language
> -* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
> -* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
> -* Focusing on what is best for the community
> -* Showing empathy towards other community members
> +* Using welcoming and inclusive language.
> +* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences.
> +* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism.
> +* Focusing on what is best for the community:.
> +* Showing empathy towards other community members.
> +* Use facts instead of opinions.

trivia:

bullet points do not need periods.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities
  2018-10-15  1:46 ` Joe Perches
@ 2018-10-16 12:21   ` Iván Chavero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Iván Chavero @ 2018-10-16 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches, corbet; +Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, gregkh, torvalds

El 14/10/18 a las 8:46 p. m., Joe Perches escribió:
> On Sun, 2018-10-14 at 13:52 -0500, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> > The language and focus of the CoC has some ambiguities that
> > could lead to conflicts that might distract maintainers and
> > contributors attention from the technical nature of the
> > Linux kernel.
> > This patch aims to clarify this problems and focus the document
> > to a more possitive, healthy and technical standpoint.
> 
> []
> > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> > b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> 
> []
> > @@ -17,23 +19,22 @@ Our Standards
> >   Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive
> > environment
> >   include:
> >   
> > -* Using welcoming and inclusive language
> > -* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
> > -* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
> > -* Focusing on what is best for the community
> > -* Showing empathy towards other community members
> > +* Using welcoming and inclusive language.
> > +* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences.
> > +* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism.
> > +* Focusing on what is best for the community:.
> > +* Showing empathy towards other community members.
> > +* Use facts instead of opinions.
> 
> trivia:
> 
> bullet points do not need periods.
> 
> 

When there are complete sentences the period is optional according to 
the Oxford dictionary [1]

if it's bad form i can remove them.


[1] https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/punctuation/bullet-points




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-16 12:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-14 18:52 [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities Ivan Chavero
2018-10-15  1:46 ` Joe Perches
2018-10-16 12:21   ` Iván Chavero

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).