From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>, kjlu@umn.edu
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: vxcan: Fix memleak in vxcan_newlink
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:20:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <986c27bf-29b4-a4f7-1dcd-4cb5a446334b@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021052150.25914-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
On 21.10.20 07:21, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> When rtnl_configure_link() fails, peer needs to be
> freed just like when register_netdevice() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Btw. as the vxcan.c driver bases on veth.c the same issue can be found
there!
At this point:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/veth.c#L1398
err_register_dev:
/* nothing to do */
err_configure_peer:
unregister_netdevice(peer);
return err; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
err_register_peer:
free_netdev(peer);
return err;
}
IMO the return must be removed to fall through the next label and free
the netdevice too.
Would you like so send a patch for veth.c too?
Best regards,
Oliver
> ---
> drivers/net/can/vxcan.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> index d6ba9426be4d..aefc5a61d239 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static int vxcan_newlink(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
>
> unregister_network_device:
> unregister_netdevice(peer);
> + free_netdev(peer);
> return err;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 5:21 [PATCH] can: vxcan: Fix memleak in vxcan_newlink Dinghao Liu
2020-10-21 11:20 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2020-10-22 5:28 ` dinghao.liu
2020-10-22 16:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-22 17:34 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2020-10-22 17:38 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=986c27bf-29b4-a4f7-1dcd-4cb5a446334b@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).