From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263232AbRFRAds>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:33:48 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263228AbRFRAdh>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:33:37 -0400
Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.243]:49966 "EHLO
	maynard.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263225AbRFRAda>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:33:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Buggy emu10k1 drivers.
From: Robert Love <rml@ufl.edu>
To: Daniel Bertrand <d.bertrand@ieee.ca>
Cc: Dylan Griffiths <Dylan_G@bigfoot.com>,
        emu10k1-devel <emu10k1-devel@opensource.creative.com>,
        Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106171707150.2262-100000@kilrogg>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106171707150.2262-100000@kilrogg>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release)
Date: 17 Jun 2001 20:33:25 -0400
Message-Id: <992824408.3203.7.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 17 Jun 2001 17:25:11 -0700, Daniel Bertrand wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2001, Robert Love wrote:
> > if the driver in the kernel is that old, could we try merging a newer
> > release?  is there any reason why it has not been done yet?
> 
> A patch was submitted to Alan in April but appears to have never made it
> in, I'm not sure what his reason was.

can a patch against the latest 2.4-ac be resubmitted to the list and
alan?  if it again does not get merged, i will take a look at it and
find what political problems it has.  i use the emu10k1 and would like
the updated driver.

-- 
Robert M. Love
rml@ufl.edu
rml@tech9.net