linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, architt@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:23:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9942b74d-7437-21cc-cbd7-38f2844c5d1d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516362223-22946-3-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On 19/01/18 11:43, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
> master's using it are active. The device_link feature
> helps to track such functional dependencies, so that the
> iommu gets powered when the master device enables itself
> using pm_runtime. So by adapting the smmu driver for
> runtime pm, above said dependency can be addressed.
> 
> This patch adds the pm runtime/sleep callbacks to the
> driver and also the functions to parse the smmu clocks
> from DT and enable them in resume/suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Clock rework to request bulk of clocks]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 78d4c6b8f1ba..21acffe91a1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>   #include <linux/of_iommu.h>
>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>   
> @@ -205,6 +206,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
>   	u32				num_global_irqs;
>   	u32				num_context_irqs;
>   	unsigned int			*irqs;
> +	struct clk_bulk_data		*clocks;
> +	int				num_clks;
> +	const char * const		*clk_names;

This seems unnecessary, as we use it a grand total of of once, during 
initialisation when we have the source data directly to hand. Just pass 
data->clks into arm_smmu_init_clks() as an additional argument.

Otherwise, I think this looks reasonable; it's about as unobtrusive as 
it's going to get.

Robin.

>   	u32				cavium_id_base; /* Specific to Cavium */
>   
> @@ -1685,6 +1689,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_id_size_to_bits(int size)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static int arm_smmu_init_clocks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int num = smmu->num_clks;
> +
> +	if (num < 1)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	smmu->clocks = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, num,
> +				    sizeof(*smmu->clocks), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!smmu->clocks)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		smmu->clocks[i].id = smmu->clk_names[i];
> +
> +	return devm_clk_bulk_get(smmu->dev, num, smmu->clocks);
> +}
> +
>   static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>   {
>   	unsigned long size;
> @@ -1897,10 +1920,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>   struct arm_smmu_match_data {
>   	enum arm_smmu_arch_version version;
>   	enum arm_smmu_implementation model;
> +	const char * const *clks;
> +	int num_clks;
>   };
>   
>   #define ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(name, ver, imp)	\
> -static struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = imp }
> +static const struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = imp }
>   
>   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU);
>   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU);
> @@ -2001,6 +2026,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>   	smmu->version = data->version;
>   	smmu->model = data->model;
> +	smmu->clk_names = data->clks;
> +	smmu->num_clks = data->num_clks;
>   
>   	parse_driver_options(smmu);
>   
> @@ -2099,6 +2126,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		smmu->irqs[i] = irq;
>   	}
>   
> +	err = arm_smmu_init_clocks(smmu);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
>   	err = arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(smmu);
>   	if (err)
>   		return err;
> @@ -2197,7 +2228,27 @@ static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_pm_ops, NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume);
> +static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clocks);
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clocks);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops arm_smmu_pm_ops = {
> +	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume)
> +	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_runtime_suspend,
> +			   arm_smmu_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
>   
>   static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
>   	.driver	= {
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-31 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-19 11:43 [PATCH v6 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] base: power: runtime: Export pm_runtime_get/put_suppliers Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-01-31 12:23   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-02-01  6:13     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-01-31 13:06   ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-01 11:33     ` Sricharan R
2018-02-01 12:31       ` Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-01-31 13:09   ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-01  8:53     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-02-02  5:40       ` Sricharan R
2018-02-02 11:31         ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-02 13:14           ` Sricharan R
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-01-29 19:42   ` Rob Herring
2018-01-31 12:00     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] drm/msm: iommu: Replace runtime calls with runtime suppliers Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9942b74d-7437-21cc-cbd7-38f2844c5d1d@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).