From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api: add kvfree script
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 09:30:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99ed463c-b7ba-0400-7cf7-5bcc1992baef@web.de> (raw)
> Check that alloc and free types of functions match each other.
Further software development challenges are interesting also for such an use case.
> +/// Check that kvmalloc'ed memory is freed by kfree functions,
> +/// vmalloc'ed by vfree functions and kvmalloc'ed by kvfree
> +/// functions.
* How do you think about to offer a wording suggestion for subjects of
generated patches?
* Will the presented case distinction trigger further improvements for
the desired matching?
* Would you like to generalise the safe handling of allocations
and corresponding release of system resources?
> +// Confidence: High
I suggest to reconsider this information once more.
> +virtual patch
> +virtual report
> +virtual org
> +virtual context
+virtual patch, report, org, context
Is such a SmPL code variant more succinct?
> +@choice@
* Can it be that this SmPL rule is not relevant for all operation modes?
* Will additional dependencies matter?
> + E = \(kmalloc@kok\|kzalloc@kok\|krealloc@kok\|kcalloc@kok\|kmalloc_node@kok\|kzalloc_node@kok\|kmalloc_array@kok\|kmalloc_array_node@kok\|kcalloc_node@kok\)(...)
I would prefer an other coding style here.
* Items for such SmPL disjunctions can be specified also on multiple lines.
* The semantic patch language supports further means to handle function name lists
in more convenient ways.
Would you like to work with customised constraints?
> +msg = "WARNING: kmalloc is used to allocate this memory at line %s" % (k[0].line)
> +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
* I propose once more omit the extra variable “msg” at similar places.
The desired message object can be directly passed as a function parameter.
* I find the diagnostic text insufficient.
* Can the corresponding function category be dynamically determined?
Are you looking for opportunities to avoid unwanted code duplication?
Regards,
Markus
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-06 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-06 7:30 Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-06-06 7:46 ` [PATCH] coccinelle: api: add kvfree script Julia Lawall
2020-06-06 9:50 ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-07 14:02 ` Coccinelle: Extending capabilities for source file pre-selection Markus Elfring
2020-06-06 11:06 ` coccinelle: api: add kvfree script Markus Elfring
2020-06-06 11:11 ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-06 11:21 ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-07 6:42 ` Coccinelle: Improving software components around usage of SmPL disjunctions Markus Elfring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-06 14:04 [PATCH] coccinelle: api: add kvfree script Markus Elfring
2020-06-06 14:39 ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-05 20:42 Denis Efremov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99ed463c-b7ba-0400-7cf7-5bcc1992baef@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=efremov@linux.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).